<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Wachowskis - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/wachowskis/</link><description>Latest from the Wachowskis desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/wachowskis/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Matrix at 25: What the Sequels Misread</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-matrix-at-25-what-the-sequels-misread/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was fourteen when &lt;em&gt;The Matrix&lt;/em&gt; opened at the end of March 1999, and like most people my age I walked out of the cinema convinced I had watched the medium change shape in real time. Twenty-five years on, the sequels have receded into film-school footnotes and a fourth instalment came and went in 2021, yet the original still plays with the tautness it had that first weekend. That durability is worth pulling apart, because the quality keeping the 1999 film alive is precisely the one the Wachowskis mislaid the moment they went back to Zion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>