<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Voyeurism - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/voyeurism/</link><description>Latest from the Voyeurism desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/voyeurism/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Brian De Palma: The Voyeur's Cinema</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/brian-de-palma-the-voyeurs-cinema/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For half a century the standard charge against Brian De Palma has been the same word: thief. He steals from Hitchcock. He restages &lt;em&gt;Psycho&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Vertigo&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Rear Window&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Rope&lt;/em&gt; without apology. The charge is true and it misses everything, because De Palma quotes Hitchcock the way a jazz musician quotes a standard — to take it somewhere colder, filthier and more self-aware than the original ever allowed. Where Hitchcock made you a guilty watcher and then let you off the hook with a resolution, De Palma leaves you hanging on the hook and makes you notice the barb.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Body Double: De Palma's Hitchcock-and-Sleaze Provocation</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/body-double-de-palmas-hitchcock-and-sleaze-provocation/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian De Palma made &lt;em&gt;Body Double&lt;/em&gt; in 1984 as a deliberate provocation, and the provocation still works. Coming off the enormous, blood-soaked &lt;em&gt;Scarface&lt;/em&gt;, he turned to the smaller, dirtier obsession that had shadowed his whole career — the act of watching — and built a thriller so nakedly indebted to Alfred Hitchcock that critics at the time treated it as plagiarism dressed up as homage. That reading misses the joke. De Palma knew exactly what he was quoting, and the film is a sustained argument about voyeurism conducted through the vocabulary of the director who invented cinematic voyeurism in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>