<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Richard Stanley - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/richard-stanley/</link><description>Latest from the Richard Stanley desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/richard-stanley/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Hardware: The Cyberpunk Nightmare on a Shoestring</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/hardware-the-cyberpunk-nightmare-on-a-shoestring/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a particular kind of low-budget genre film that turns its own poverty
into an aesthetic weapon, and Richard Stanley&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Hardware&lt;/em&gt; (1990) is one of the
best of them. Made for something on the order of a million and a half dollars, it
looks like it cost either far more or far less than that, depending on the shot —
a scavenged, sweat-slicked, red-lit vision of a poisoned near-future built almost
entirely inside a handful of cramped sets. It should not work as well as it does.
It works because Stanley understood that atmosphere is cheaper than spectacle and
frequently scarier.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>