<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Practical Effects - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/practical-effects/</link><description>Latest from the Practical Effects desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/practical-effects/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Thing (1982): Carpenter's Paranoia Machine and What It Owes Who Goes There</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-thing-1982-carpenters-paranoia-machine-and-what-it-owes-who-goes-there/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a story critics like to tell about &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt;, and the story is almost true. It opened on 25 June 1982, two weeks after &lt;em&gt;E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial&lt;/em&gt;, and audiences who wanted a friendly alien recoiled from John Carpenter&amp;rsquo;s version, which arrives by crashing a spaceship into the ice and then eating the sled dogs. The reviews were savage. The film lost money. Carpenter, who had come off &lt;em&gt;Halloween&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Escape from New York&lt;/em&gt; as one of the most bankable genre directors alive, spent years in the commercial cold because of it. All of that happened. What the story leaves out is that &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt; was right and everyone else was wrong, and the ice took forty years to admit it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Dead Alive (Braindead): Peter Jackson's Splatter Comedy Peak</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/dead-alive-braindead-peter-jacksons-splatter-comedy-peak/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a story people tell about Peter Jackson, and it goes: video-shop kid from Pukerua Bay makes home-made splatter films, then somehow ends up an Oscar-laden lord of Middle-earth. The film that sits at the hinge of that story is &lt;em&gt;Braindead&lt;/em&gt; (1992), released in North America as &lt;em&gt;Dead Alive&lt;/em&gt;, and it remains the most concentrated dose of what made Jackson worth watching in the first place. It is, by a wide and gleeful margin, the goriest film ever made — production reportedly ran through hundreds of litres of fake blood for the finale alone — and it is also, disarmingly, a tender little comedy about a boy who cannot leave his mother. Those two facts are the whole film, and the way they braid together is why it endures.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Street Trash: The Melt Movie as Reagan-Era Fable</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/street-trash-the-melt-movie-as-reagan-era-fable/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a small, disreputable genre of 1980s horror that fans call the melt movie, and &lt;em&gt;Street Trash&lt;/em&gt; is its filthy masterpiece. The premise is a one-line joke: a liquor-store owner finds a dusty case of wine called Tenafly Viper walled up in his cellar, sells it for a dollar a bottle to the homeless men living in a junkyard, and the wine dissolves anyone who drinks it into a puddle of glowing coloured slime. That is the whole engine. What makes the film worth a revisit almost forty years on is that Jim Muro and writer-producer Roy Frumkes built something around that joke — a genuinely angry, genuinely funny fable about who American prosperity decided was disposable, told in the most tasteless idiom available.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Body-Horror Starter Kit</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-body-horror-starter-kit/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Body horror is the genre of the traitor within. Every other kind of horror puts the threat outside the self — the killer at the door, the ghost in the hall, the thing in the woods. This one locates the danger in your own flesh, in the appalling suspicion that the body you live in is a stranger that can turn on you without warning. It is the horror of illness, of puberty, of ageing, of the surgeon&amp;rsquo;s table, filmed with the metaphor made literal. That is why it endures across every era: everyone, eventually, feels their own body become unfamiliar, and these films name the dread out loud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Death of the Man in the Suit: Creature Design After CGI</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-death-of-the-man-in-the-suit-creature-design-after-cgi/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For most of the twentieth century, a film monster was a person. Somebody sweated inside a foam-latex suit under hot lights, saw the world through a mask with terrible peripheral vision, and moved that body across a real set while a real camera watched. The constraint was total and it was the making of the whole art form. When creature design went digital, the industry celebrated the liberation — anything imaginable, no more actors fainting inside rubber — and it was right about the freedom. It was slower to notice what it had thrown away. The man in the suit was a set of limits, and those limits were where the fear lived.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Moon: Sam Rockwell, Alone, and Duncan Jones's Debut</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/moon-sam-rockwell-alone-and-duncan-joness-debut/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Moon&lt;/em&gt; opens with an advert. A clean corporate voice explains that Lunar Industries has solved Earth&amp;rsquo;s energy crisis by harvesting helium-3 from the far side of the Moon, and that the whole operation runs quietly, cheaply, almost automatically. Then the film cuts to the man who actually keeps it running, and spends ninety minutes showing you what &amp;ldquo;almost automatically&amp;rdquo; costs a single human being. Duncan Jones&amp;rsquo;s 2009 debut was made for around five million dollars, shot on a soundstage in England with models and miniatures rather than digital vistas, and it remains one of the most quietly devastating science-fiction films of the century&amp;rsquo;s first decade.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>What Latex Knows That Pixels Don't: Practical Effects vs CGI</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/what-latex-knows-that-pixels-dont-practical-effects-vs-cgi/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Watch Rob Bottin&amp;rsquo;s creature work in &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt; (1982) beside almost any digital monster of the last decade and the older film wins on a metric that has nothing to do with nostalgia. The dog-thing splitting open, the defibrillator scene, the head that sprouts legs and scuttles away: these were built out of latex, mechanics, gelatine and enough karo syrup to drown a small town, and they still make audiences flinch forty years on. A great deal of expensive digital horror from the 2010s already looks dated. The gap is not a matter of taste or of one era being braver. It is physics, and understanding the physics tells you when to reach for the rubber and when the render is genuinely the better tool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>