<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Philip K Dick - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/philip-k-dick/</link><description>Latest from the Philip K Dick desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/philip-k-dick/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Blade Runner: Which Cut Is the Film, and Why It Matters</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/blade-runner-which-cut-is-the-film-and-why-it-matters/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no single object called &lt;em&gt;Blade Runner&lt;/em&gt;. There are at least seven, and the arguments over which one counts have outlasted most of the careers involved. Ridley Scott&amp;rsquo;s 1982 adaptation of Philip K. Dick&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&lt;/em&gt; went out to American cinemas with a hard-boiled voiceover and a sunlit ending, flopped against &lt;em&gt;E.T.&lt;/em&gt;, and then spent forty years mutating in the dark like something in Tyrell&amp;rsquo;s lab. To love this film properly you have to know which one you love, and why the differences are load-bearing rather than cosmetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>