<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>John Carpenter - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/john-carpenter/</link><description>Latest from the John Carpenter desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/john-carpenter/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Thing (1982): Carpenter's Paranoia Machine and What It Owes Who Goes There</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-thing-1982-carpenters-paranoia-machine-and-what-it-owes-who-goes-there/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a story critics like to tell about &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt;, and the story is almost true. It opened on 25 June 1982, two weeks after &lt;em&gt;E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial&lt;/em&gt;, and audiences who wanted a friendly alien recoiled from John Carpenter&amp;rsquo;s version, which arrives by crashing a spaceship into the ice and then eating the sled dogs. The reviews were savage. The film lost money. Carpenter, who had come off &lt;em&gt;Halloween&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Escape from New York&lt;/em&gt; as one of the most bankable genre directors alive, spent years in the commercial cold because of it. All of that happened. What the story leaves out is that &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt; was right and everyone else was wrong, and the ice took forty years to admit it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>John Carpenter: The Siege, the Synth, and the Sceptic</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/john-carpenter-the-siege-the-synth-and-the-sceptic/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a shot John Carpenter keeps coming back to across forty years: a wide, patient composition, the anamorphic frame held steady while something wrong drifts in from the edge. He rarely cuts to it. He lets you find it. That instinct — trust the audience to feel the dread before the movie names it — is the throughline of a filmography that looks scattered on paper (slasher, sci-fi actioner, kung-fu comedy, small-town ghost story) and turns out to be one man circling the same three obsessions for his whole working life.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Big Trouble in Little China: The Action Film Where the Hero Is the Sidekick</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/big-trouble-in-little-china-the-action-film-where-the-hero-is-the-sidekick/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John Carpenter&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Big Trouble in Little China&lt;/em&gt; (1986) died on release. It cost around twenty-five million dollars, made back a fraction of that, helped sour Carpenter on the studio system for good, and then it did the thing that the best flops do: it refused to stay dead. Rented, taped, traded and re-watched for four decades, it has become one of the most beloved cult films of its era, and the reason is a single structural gag so clean that most first-time viewers do not notice it is happening to them. The film gives you a swaggering, wisecracking action hero in Kurt Russell&amp;rsquo;s Jack Burton, and then it quietly arranges the plot so that Jack is useless, the comic sidekick who has wandered into the lead role and never worked it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Halloween (1978): The Slasher Blueprint, Drawn in Shadow</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/halloween-1978-the-slasher-blueprint-drawn-in-shadow/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The scariest thing in &lt;em&gt;Halloween&lt;/em&gt; is an empty patch of the frame. Watch the film again and notice how often John Carpenter composes a wide shot of a sunlit suburban street, or a tidy living room, or a quiet bit of hedge, and simply lets you look at it, waiting — until a pale shape resolves out of the background where a second ago there was nothing. He does not cut to the killer. He does not sting the music. He lets Michael Myers stand there, half-seen, in the part of the image your eye was not watching, and trusts you to find him and go cold. That single instinct, repeated with total discipline across ninety minutes, is why a low-budget independent picture from 1978 became the most influential horror film of the modern era, and why the hundreds of imitators it spawned almost never understood what they were copying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Escape From New York: Carpenter, Snake, and the Dystopia on a Budget</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/escape-from-new-york-carpenter-snake-and-the-dystopia-on-a-budget/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John Carpenter wrote &lt;em&gt;Escape From New York&lt;/em&gt; in the mid-1970s, in the sour aftermath of Watergate, and could not get it made. Studios found it too bleak, too cynical, too convinced that the American future was a prison. It took the success of &lt;em&gt;Halloween&lt;/em&gt; to give him the leverage, and even then he made it for around six million dollars — pocket change for a film that had to convincingly turn all of Manhattan into a maximum-security penal colony. That gap, between the scale of the vision and the poverty of the means, is the whole story of why &lt;em&gt;Escape From New York&lt;/em&gt; (1981) works, and why every ambitious low-budget genre film since has quietly studied it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>