<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Hammer Horror - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/hammer-horror/</link><description>Latest from the Hammer Horror desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/hammer-horror/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Twins of Evil: Hammer's Puritans-vs-Vampires Morality Play</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/twins-of-evil-hammers-puritans-vs-vampires-morality-play/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most Hammer vampire films know exactly who the villain is: the aristocrat in the castle with the appetite and the cape. &lt;em&gt;Twins of Evil&lt;/em&gt; (1971) is the one that hedges the question, and it is the better for it. The film hands you a monster in the castle, all right — a decadent count dabbling in Satanism — and then plants directly opposite him a second, human monster: a fanatical witch-hunter burning innocent girls in the name of God. For most of its length &lt;em&gt;Twins of Evil&lt;/em&gt; is a study of two fanaticisms, the supernatural and the puritanical, circling a pair of young women caught between them. That it comes packaged as a piece of early-1970s exploitation, with all the sensationalism the era demanded, only makes the moral seriousness underneath more surprising.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Countess Dracula: Hammer's Blood-Bathing Aristocrat</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/countess-dracula-hammers-blood-bathing-aristocrat/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Countess Dracula&lt;/em&gt; (1971) is the great mis-sold film in the Hammer catalogue. The title promises fangs, capes and a female cousin to Christopher Lee&amp;rsquo;s Count. What it delivers is a gothic tragedy about vanity and ageing in which no one is bitten, no one turns to mist, and the only blood being drunk is bathed in rather than swallowed. Hammer&amp;rsquo;s marketing department borrowed the most bankable name in horror and stuck it on a film that has nothing to do with vampirism at all — and the odd thing is that the mislabelling has protected it. Approach &lt;em&gt;Countess Dracula&lt;/em&gt; expecting another vampire picture and it disappoints; approach it as what it actually is, and it turns out to be one of the studio&amp;rsquo;s more interesting curiosities of the early 1970s.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Hammer Horror and the Colourising of the Gothic</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/hammer-horror-and-the-colourising-of-the-gothic/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When Universal made its monsters in the 1930s, it made them in black and white, and the monochrome did a great deal of moral work the studio never had to acknowledge. Shadow hides. It abstracts blood into a dark smear, turns a wound into a shape, keeps the body decorous even in death. Twenty years later a small British studio called Hammer took exactly those characters — Frankenstein&amp;rsquo;s creature, Dracula, the Mummy, the Wolf Man — and ran them through Eastmancolor, and the moment the blood turned red the whole gothic changed character. Hammer&amp;rsquo;s real innovation was chromatic. The studio worked out what colour does to horror, and the answer was: it makes everything explicit that monochrome had let you deny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Hammer Horror Essential Ten</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-hammer-horror-essential-ten/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When Universal&amp;rsquo;s monsters ran out of fur and fangs, a small British studio in a country house at Bray took the same characters, added Eastmancolor, blood the shade of Dulux gloss, and a frankness about sex and violence the Americans had never dared, and sold them back to the world. Hammer Film Productions dominated horror from 1957 into the mid-1970s on budgets that would embarrass a modern advert, and it did so with a repertory company as recognisable as any studio&amp;rsquo;s: Peter Cushing&amp;rsquo;s fine-boned intelligence, Christopher Lee&amp;rsquo;s towering menace, Terence Fisher&amp;rsquo;s unfussy classical framing, James Bernard&amp;rsquo;s brass-heavy scores blaring the very word &amp;ldquo;Dra-cu-la&amp;rdquo; in three notes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>