<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Guide - Tag - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/guide/</link><description>Guide - Tag - vo.rs</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/guide/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fine-Tuning vs Prompting vs RAG: Picking the Right Tool Without Wasting GPU Hours</title><link>https://vo.rs/story/fine-tuning-vs-prompting-vs-rag-picking-the-right-tool/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When a language model is not behaving as you would like, there is a powerful temptation to reach straight for the heaviest tool in the shed. People hear &amp;ldquo;fine-tuning,&amp;rdquo; picture a model retrained on their data, and book a pile of expensive GPU hours before they have even worked out what the actual problem is. More often than not, the result is wasted money and a model that is no better. The truth is that prompting, retrieval, and fine-tuning solve genuinely different problems, and choosing well saves you both effort and grief. This guide gives you a clear framework for picking the right one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>