<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Gothic Horror - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/gothic-horror/</link><description>Latest from the Gothic Horror desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/gothic-horror/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Haunting (1963): The Ghost You Never See</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-haunting-1963-the-ghost-you-never-see/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a scene in &lt;em&gt;The Haunting&lt;/em&gt; where two women lie in the dark, holding hands, while something the size of a locomotive pounds on the wall of Hill House, working its way down the corridor towards their door. You never see it. You never find out what it is. The camera stays on their faces and on the door, which begins, slowly, to breathe — the wood bulging inward as if the house itself were pressing a lung against it. Robert Wise&amp;rsquo;s 1963 film has been out for more than sixty years, and I have yet to find anything that frightens me more efficiently, with less shown, than that breathing door.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Vampire Lovers: Hammer Adapts Carmilla</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-vampire-lovers-hammer-adapts-carmilla/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By 1970 Hammer had a problem, and it was a problem of its own making. For a decade and a half the studio had ruled Gothic horror with its Draculas and Frankensteins, its plush colour and its heaving décolletage, and the formula had aged into something the newer, franker cinema of the era was starting to make look quaint. &lt;em&gt;The Vampire Lovers&lt;/em&gt; was Hammer&amp;rsquo;s answer: an adaptation of a novella older than &lt;em&gt;Dracula&lt;/em&gt; itself, made just as British censorship loosened its grip, that reset the studio&amp;rsquo;s register for a new and more permissive decade. It is a transitional film in the exact, literal sense — you can watch Hammer changing gears inside it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Flesh for Frankenstein: Morrissey and Warhol's Lurid Gothic</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/flesh-for-frankenstein-morrissey-and-warhols-lurid-gothic/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a moment, watching &lt;em&gt;Flesh for Frankenstein&lt;/em&gt;, when you realise the film has no interest in scaring you and every interest in embarrassing you for expecting it to. Udo Kier, playing the Baron von Frankenstein with the fixed intensity of a man reading an eye chart in a language he half-knows, delivers his mad-scientist creed straight down the lens. The gore arrives in fistfuls. The 3D process shoves entrails toward your face. And underneath the lurid surface sits a genuinely strange proposition: a Gothic horror made by people who found Gothic horror faintly ridiculous, and who decided the ridiculousness was the point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>