<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Genre Debate - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/genre-debate/</link><description>Latest from the Genre Debate desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/genre-debate/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Elevated Horror and the Backlash Against the Slow Burn</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/elevated-horror-and-the-backlash-against-the-slow-burn/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Somewhere around 2015 a new phrase started appearing in reviews, and it caused more argument than any film it was attached to. &amp;ldquo;Elevated horror.&amp;rdquo; The term arrived to describe a wave of slow, dread-soaked, formally ambitious genre pictures — Robert Eggers&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;The Witch&lt;/em&gt;, David Robert Mitchell&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;It Follows&lt;/em&gt;, Jennifer Kent&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;The Babadook&lt;/em&gt;, and soon the twin peaks of Ari Aster&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Hereditary&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Midsommar&lt;/em&gt; — many of them distributed by A24, whose logo became shorthand for a certain kind of tasteful terror. And the moment the phrase caught on, a counter-army mobilised to hate it, because &amp;ldquo;elevated&amp;rdquo; carries an unmistakable insult in its tailcoat: elevated above &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt;, exactly?&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>