<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Film Industry - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/film-industry/</link><description>Latest from the Film Industry desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/film-industry/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why the Erotic Thriller Migrated to Streaming and Softened</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/why-the-erotic-thriller-migrated-to-streaming-and-softened/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For roughly fifteen years the erotic thriller was a genuine box-office animal. &lt;em&gt;Body Heat&lt;/em&gt; (1981) proved a studio could sell adult desire as noir; &lt;em&gt;Fatal Attraction&lt;/em&gt; (1987) turned it into a national argument; &lt;em&gt;Basic Instinct&lt;/em&gt; (1992) made it a global phenomenon and one of the year&amp;rsquo;s biggest hits. These were mid-budget films for grown-ups, playing wide, opening at number one, and treating sex as a plot engine with real consequences. Then, over a decade, the whole category slid off the theatrical map, and when it reappeared it was on a streaming tile, quieter and more careful. The migration is one of the clearest cases in modern cinema of an economic change rewriting what a genre is allowed to feel like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>