<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Fanny Hill - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/fanny-hill/</link><description>Latest from the Fanny Hill desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/fanny-hill/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fanny Hill (1964): Russ Meyer Films the Notorious Novel With Wit</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/fanny-hill-1964-russ-meyer-films-the-notorious-novel-with-wit/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a lovely irony sitting at the centre of the 1964 &lt;em&gt;Fanny Hill&lt;/em&gt;, and it takes a moment to see it. Here is a version of the most notorious erotic novel in the English language — a book prosecuted on and off for two centuries — rendered as a chaste, giggling bedroom farce with more slamming doors than skin. And here is Russ Meyer, the American who would spend the rest of the decade making the raunchiest films the drive-ins could bear, directing it as a man in a straitjacket. The gap between subject and treatment is the whole story of the picture, and it makes &lt;em&gt;Fanny Hill&lt;/em&gt; far more interesting to think about than it is to watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>