<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Danny Boyle - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/danny-boyle/</link><description>Latest from the Danny Boyle desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/danny-boyle/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Sunshine: Boyle's Beautiful Film That Loses Its Nerve in Act Three</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/sunshine-boyles-beautiful-film-that-loses-its-nerve-in-act-three/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a version of &lt;em&gt;Sunshine&lt;/em&gt; that would sit in the top rank of space films, quoted in the same breath as &lt;em&gt;2001&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Alien&lt;/em&gt;, and for roughly seventy minutes Danny Boyle actually made it. Then, with the destination in sight, the 2007 film reaches into a different drawer, pulls out a slasher, and spends its final act being chased around the corridors by a monster it did not need. Almost twenty years on, that swerve is still the most discussed thing about the picture, and the argument it started — did the third act ruin &lt;em&gt;Sunshine&lt;/em&gt; or merely complicate it? — is worth reopening, because the answer tells you something about how hard science fiction is allowed to end.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>