<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Cyberpunk - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/cyberpunk/</link><description>Latest from the Cyberpunk desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/cyberpunk/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Ghost in the Shell (1995): The Frames Everyone Quoted</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/ghost-in-the-shell-1995-the-frames-everyone-quoted/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some films are influential in the loose sense that people took ideas from them. Mamoru Oshii&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Ghost in the Shell&lt;/em&gt; is influential in the literal sense that people took its shots. The falling green code, the dive from a skyscraper under an invisibility cloak, the slow drift through a drowned neon city while a choir keens overhead — these are images the next thirty years of science fiction lifted, reframed and sold back to us, sometimes with the debt acknowledged and often without. It is one of the most quoted films in the genre, and the strange thing is how quiet and contemplative the original actually is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Akira: The Anime That Sold the West on the Form</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/akira-the-anime-that-sold-the-west-on-the-form/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a shot early in &lt;em&gt;Akira&lt;/em&gt; that did more for animation in the West than a decade of arguments could. A red motorcycle brakes at speed, and instead of a cut the camera holds on the tyre laying a long streak of light down a wet Neo-Tokyo motorway, the whole machine sliding sideways with a weight and follow-through no Western cartoon of 1988 would have dared to draw. Anyone who saw that on a battered VHS tape understood in a heartbeat that animation could carry adult weight, real speed and genuine dread. &lt;em&gt;Akira&lt;/em&gt; is the film that changed the argument, and it changed it by spending money most anime never saw.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Matrix at 25: What the Sequels Misread</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-matrix-at-25-what-the-sequels-misread/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was fourteen when &lt;em&gt;The Matrix&lt;/em&gt; opened at the end of March 1999, and like most people my age I walked out of the cinema convinced I had watched the medium change shape in real time. Twenty-five years on, the sequels have receded into film-school footnotes and a fourth instalment came and went in 2021, yet the original still plays with the tautness it had that first weekend. That durability is worth pulling apart, because the quality keeping the 1999 film alive is precisely the one the Wachowskis mislaid the moment they went back to Zion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tetsuo: The Iron Man: Tsukamoto's Body-Horror Assault</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/tetsuo-the-iron-man-tsukamotos-body-horror-assault/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tetsuo: The Iron Man&lt;/em&gt; runs sixty-seven minutes, was shot on 16mm in black and white by a tiny crew over something like eighteen exhausting months, and hits like a cattle prod. Shinya Tsukamoto&amp;rsquo;s 1989 debut is the loudest quiet film you will ever see — a near-wordless industrial nightmare about a man turning into scrap metal, assembled frame by punishing frame in the director&amp;rsquo;s own apartment with a cast of friends who doubled as crew. Nothing about its budget or its length should produce something this overwhelming. It does anyway, and thirty-five years later almost everything that has tried to copy it looks tame.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blade Runner 2049: The Sequel That Earned Its Silence</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/blade-runner-2049-the-sequel-that-earned-its-silence/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A sequel to &lt;em&gt;Blade Runner&lt;/em&gt; was, for thirty-five years, the sort of idea that made cinephiles wince before it made them curious. The original had already fractured into &lt;a href="https://vo.rs/screen/blade-runner-which-cut-is-the-film-and-why-it-matters/"&gt;seven arguable versions&lt;/a&gt;; its whole authority came from restraint, mood and a question it refused to answer. The obvious way to make more money from it was to explain it, expand it, and stuff it with action. That Denis Villeneuve&amp;rsquo;s 2017 &lt;em&gt;Blade Runner 2049&lt;/em&gt; did almost the opposite is the first small miracle. That it did so while running nearly three hours, opening slow and staying slow, is the second.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blade Runner: Which Cut Is the Film, and Why It Matters</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/blade-runner-which-cut-is-the-film-and-why-it-matters/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no single object called &lt;em&gt;Blade Runner&lt;/em&gt;. There are at least seven, and the arguments over which one counts have outlasted most of the careers involved. Ridley Scott&amp;rsquo;s 1982 adaptation of Philip K. Dick&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&lt;/em&gt; went out to American cinemas with a hard-boiled voiceover and a sunlit ending, flopped against &lt;em&gt;E.T.&lt;/em&gt;, and then spent forty years mutating in the dark like something in Tyrell&amp;rsquo;s lab. To love this film properly you have to know which one you love, and why the differences are load-bearing rather than cosmetic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>