<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Countess Dracula - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/countess-dracula/</link><description>Latest from the Countess Dracula desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/countess-dracula/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Countess Dracula: Hammer's Blood-Bathing Aristocrat</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/countess-dracula-hammers-blood-bathing-aristocrat/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Countess Dracula&lt;/em&gt; (1971) is the great mis-sold film in the Hammer catalogue. The title promises fangs, capes and a female cousin to Christopher Lee&amp;rsquo;s Count. What it delivers is a gothic tragedy about vanity and ageing in which no one is bitten, no one turns to mist, and the only blood being drunk is bathed in rather than swallowed. Hammer&amp;rsquo;s marketing department borrowed the most bankable name in horror and stuck it on a film that has nothing to do with vampirism at all — and the odd thing is that the mislabelling has protected it. Approach &lt;em&gt;Countess Dracula&lt;/em&gt; expecting another vampire picture and it disappoints; approach it as what it actually is, and it turns out to be one of the studio&amp;rsquo;s more interesting curiosities of the early 1970s.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>