<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Body-Horror - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/body-horror/</link><description>Latest from the Body-Horror desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/body-horror/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Thing (1982): Carpenter's Paranoia Machine and What It Owes Who Goes There</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-thing-1982-carpenters-paranoia-machine-and-what-it-owes-who-goes-there/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a story critics like to tell about &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt;, and the story is almost true. It opened on 25 June 1982, two weeks after &lt;em&gt;E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial&lt;/em&gt;, and audiences who wanted a friendly alien recoiled from John Carpenter&amp;rsquo;s version, which arrives by crashing a spaceship into the ice and then eating the sled dogs. The reviews were savage. The film lost money. Carpenter, who had come off &lt;em&gt;Halloween&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Escape from New York&lt;/em&gt; as one of the most bankable genre directors alive, spent years in the commercial cold because of it. All of that happened. What the story leaves out is that &lt;em&gt;The Thing&lt;/em&gt; was right and everyone else was wrong, and the ice took forty years to admit it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Videodrome: The Prophecy About the Screen</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/videodrome-the-prophecy-about-the-screen/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some films age into their meaning. &lt;em&gt;Videodrome&lt;/em&gt; was a commercial disappointment in 1983 — a strange, sticky, unclassifiable thing that confused audiences who wanted either a clean horror picture or a clean idea and got neither. Then the world caught up with it. Watch it now, in a house full of screens that watch back, and David Cronenberg&amp;rsquo;s fever about television reads like a document that was simply filed forty years early. It is a horror film, an addiction study, and a piece of media theory that happens to have a pulsing, breathing videocassette in it, and the reason it endures is that its central worry has only grown truer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Fly (1986): Cronenberg's Love Story Told in Meat</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-fly-1986-cronenbergs-love-story-told-in-meat/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People remember &lt;em&gt;The Fly&lt;/em&gt; for the fingernails. The ear. The baboon turned inside out. The moment a man walks his own severed body parts to a bathroom cabinet he keeps like a museum of what he used to be. Chris Walas won an Academy Award for that makeup, and he earned it — the effects still look wet and specific and horribly plausible forty years on. But the gore is the delivery system, and mistaking it for the film is like remembering a funeral for the flowers. David Cronenberg made a monster movie whose real subject is the thing nobody wants to watch: love standing at a bedside while a body it adores dissolves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>David Cronenberg: The Flesh and the Machine</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/david-cronenberg-the-flesh-and-the-machine/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most horror directors are afraid of the body. David Cronenberg is fascinated by it — the way it leaks, mutates, betrays, and occasionally improves. For half a century he has made films about flesh doing things flesh should not do, and the reason they unsettle so precisely is that he never treats the transformation as evil. To Cronenberg, disease is a form of change, and change is neither good nor bad; it is simply what happens next. That clinical calm, laid over the most visceral images in mainstream cinema, is the signature. He films the end of the human as we know it with the composure of a man reading a lab report.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Body-Horror Starter Kit</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-body-horror-starter-kit/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Body horror is the genre of the traitor within. Every other kind of horror puts the threat outside the self — the killer at the door, the ghost in the hall, the thing in the woods. This one locates the danger in your own flesh, in the appalling suspicion that the body you live in is a stranger that can turn on you without warning. It is the horror of illness, of puberty, of ageing, of the surgeon&amp;rsquo;s table, filmed with the metaphor made literal. That is why it endures across every era: everyone, eventually, feels their own body become unfamiliar, and these films name the dread out loud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>eXistenZ: Cronenberg's Game That Predicted the Console War</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/existenz-cronenbergs-game-that-predicted-the-console-war/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the spring of 1999 two films about jacking your consciousness into a fabricated world opened within weeks of each other. One of them dressed its heroes in black leather, gave them guns and a messiah, and became the defining blockbuster of its generation. The other grew its game consoles out of amphibian tissue, plugged them into a hole at the base of your spine, and quietly told the truth about where the games industry was heading. &lt;em&gt;The Matrix&lt;/em&gt; got the decade. David Cronenberg&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;eXistenZ&lt;/em&gt; got the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Society (1989): The Body-Horror Satire With the Nastiest Ending</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/society-1989-the-body-horror-satire-with-the-nastiest-ending/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Yuzna&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Society&lt;/em&gt; (1989) is a film with a secret, and the secret is that it spends most of its running time pretending to be a much tamer movie. For an hour it plays as a moody, slightly stiff paranoid thriller about a Beverly Hills teenager who suspects his wealthy family is hiding something monstrous. The pacing wobbles, the acting varies, and a first-time viewer could be forgiven for wondering what the fuss is about. Then the last reel arrives, and the film unleashes one of the most deliriously repulsive climaxes in horror history, a set-piece so far beyond what the previous hour prepared you for that it retroactively rewrites everything you have watched. &lt;em&gt;Society&lt;/em&gt; is a slow build with a nuclear payload, and the wait is the whole design.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tetsuo: The Iron Man: Tsukamoto's Body-Horror Assault</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/tetsuo-the-iron-man-tsukamotos-body-horror-assault/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tetsuo: The Iron Man&lt;/em&gt; runs sixty-seven minutes, was shot on 16mm in black and white by a tiny crew over something like eighteen exhausting months, and hits like a cattle prod. Shinya Tsukamoto&amp;rsquo;s 1989 debut is the loudest quiet film you will ever see — a near-wordless industrial nightmare about a man turning into scrap metal, assembled frame by punishing frame in the director&amp;rsquo;s own apartment with a cast of friends who doubled as crew. Nothing about its budget or its length should produce something this overwhelming. It does anyway, and thirty-five years later almost everything that has tried to copy it looks tame.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Annihilation: The Studio's Nerve Failed, the Film Didn't</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/annihilation-the-studios-nerve-failed-the-film-didnt/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paramount had a problem with Alex Garland&amp;rsquo;s second feature, and the problem was that somebody had watched it closely. Late in 2017 the film tested badly. Audiences came out confused and rattled, and David Ellison — whose Skydance money was inside the picture — pushed for changes: soften Natalie Portman&amp;rsquo;s biologist, warm up Jennifer Jason Leigh&amp;rsquo;s psychologist, and rework an ending that sends a paying crowd home without the reassurance they came for. Producer Scott Rudin held Garland&amp;rsquo;s contractual final cut and declined to open it. Left with a film it no longer knew how to sell, the studio arranged an exit. Paramount kept theatrical rights in the United States, Canada and China, and handed the rest of the planet to Netflix, where &lt;em&gt;Annihilation&lt;/em&gt; surfaced a few weeks after its American opening as something you scrolled past on a quiet Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Body-Horror Lineage From Cronenberg to Ducournau</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-body-horror-lineage-from-cronenberg-to-ducournau/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Body horror is the subgenre that believes the call is coming from inside the house, and the house is you. Its terror lives in the slow, intimate treachery of your own flesh rather than in any monster in the woods: a growth, a mutation, a transformation you can feel but cannot stop. It is horror without an exit, because you cannot run from your own body, and the greatest practitioners have understood that this makes it the most philosophical corner of the genre. What is a person, when the person&amp;rsquo;s meat starts to disagree with them? The lineage that answers this runs cleanly from one filmmaker to the next, each inheriting the flesh and doing something new to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>