<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blade Runner 2049 - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/blade-runner-2049/</link><description>Latest from the Blade Runner 2049 desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/blade-runner-2049/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Blade Runner 2049: The Sequel That Earned Its Silence</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/blade-runner-2049-the-sequel-that-earned-its-silence/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A sequel to &lt;em&gt;Blade Runner&lt;/em&gt; was, for thirty-five years, the sort of idea that made cinephiles wince before it made them curious. The original had already fractured into &lt;a href="https://vo.rs/screen/blade-runner-which-cut-is-the-film-and-why-it-matters/"&gt;seven arguable versions&lt;/a&gt;; its whole authority came from restraint, mood and a question it refused to answer. The obvious way to make more money from it was to explain it, expand it, and stuff it with action. That Denis Villeneuve&amp;rsquo;s 2017 &lt;em&gt;Blade Runner 2049&lt;/em&gt; did almost the opposite is the first small miracle. That it did so while running nearly three hours, opening slow and staying slow, is the second.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>