<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Aliens - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/tags/aliens/</link><description>Latest from the Aliens desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/tags/aliens/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Aliens: How Cameron Turned Dread Into Warfare</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/aliens-how-cameron-turned-dread-into-warfare/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The smartest thing James Cameron ever did was refuse to remake the film he was hired to follow. In 1979 Ridley Scott&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Alien&lt;/em&gt; had been a haunted-house picture in orbit, a slow, dripping horror film about a single unkillable thing stalking a crew through a dark ship. The obvious sequel was more of the same, bigger. When Cameron took the job for 1986&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Aliens&lt;/em&gt;, he pitched something that should not have worked: keep the creature and the survivor, throw out the genre, and make a combat film. He even wrote the title on a blackboard as &lt;em&gt;Alien&lt;/em&gt; with an &lt;em&gt;s&lt;/em&gt; scratched over a dollar sign, or so the studio legend goes. The gamble is the reason the two films sit side by side as equals instead of as an original and its echo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>