Skyscraper Day
<p>When the ten-storey Home Insurance Building opened in Chicago in 1885, it did something no large building had done before: it hung its walls on a skeleton of iron and steel rather than piling them up from thick masonry. The architect, William Le Baron Jenney, had effectively turned a building inside out, letting a metal frame carry the load so the exterior could be thin, even glassy. That structural trick is why most histories call it the world’s first skyscraper, and it set off a vertical race that has not stopped since. Skyscraper Day, marked on 3 September, is dated to the birthday of the man who gave that race its philosophy, Louis Henry Sullivan.</p>
<h2 id="why-3-september">Why 3 September</h2><div class="ad-unit ad-in-article" aria-label="Advertisement">
<span class="ad-label">Advertisement</span>
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:block;text-align:center"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3726833845844946"
data-ad-slot="3291553914"
data-ad-format="auto"
data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script>
</div>
<p>Sullivan, born on 3 September 1856, is popularly called the father of the skyscraper, though the title needs a little care. He did not invent the steel frame, and he did not design the first one; Jenney did. What Sullivan did, working in Chicago in the boom years after the great fire of 1871, was work out what a tall building should look like and mean. His Wainwright Building in St Louis and the Guaranty Building in Buffalo treated the skyscraper not as a stack of conventional storeys but as a single soaring composition, with vertical lines drawing the eye upward. His dictum that “form ever follows function” became one of the most quoted phrases in architecture and shaped the modernism that came after him. Choosing his birthday for the observance honours the designer who taught the tall building how to be itself rather than the engineer who first made it stand.</p>
<h2 id="the-inventions-that-made-height-possible">The inventions that made height possible</h2>
<p>The skyscraper was not one breakthrough but a convergence of several. The first was cheap, strong steel, made plentiful by the Bessemer process from the 1850s, which allowed a building’s weight to be carried by a slender riveted frame instead of walls so thick they would have swallowed the lower floors of a very tall tower. The second was the safety lift. Elisha Otis demonstrated his fail-safe braking mechanism at the 1853 New York exhibition by having the rope holding his platform cut while he stood on it, and the platform held; without that assurance, no one would have rented an office twenty floors up. Add electric lighting, steam heating and, later, the telephone, and the tall office building became not just possible to build but comfortable to occupy. Chicago and New York, both short of land and flush with commercial ambition, became the laboratories where the type was perfected.</p>
<h2 id="a-history-of-one-upmanship">A history of one-upmanship</h2><div class="ad-unit ad-in-article" aria-label="Advertisement">
<span class="ad-label">Advertisement</span>
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:block;text-align:center"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3726833845844946"
data-ad-slot="3291553914"
data-ad-format="auto"
data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script>
</div>
<p>The story of the skyscraper is, more than almost any other building type, a story of records broken for their own sake. New York took the lead from Chicago and turned the race into spectacle. The Woolworth Building of 1913, the “Cathedral of Commerce,” held the title until the late 1920s, when a genuine duel broke out between the Chrysler Building and 40 Wall Street. The Chrysler’s architect, William Van Alen, kept a 56-metre stainless-steel spire hidden inside the building and hoisted it through the roof at the last moment in 1930 to snatch the record. He held it barely a year. The Empire State Building, finished in 1931 during the depths of the Depression, took the crown at 381 metres and kept it for nearly forty years, an unusually long reign in so competitive a field. The race later left America altogether, moving to Kuala Lumpur’s Petronas Towers, Taipei 101, and finally Dubai, where the Burj Khalifa opened in 2010 at 828 metres and 163 floors, more than twice the height of the Empire State and still, after well over a decade, the tallest building in the world.</p>
<h2 id="why-the-day-matters">Why the day matters</h2>
<p>Beyond the spectacle, the case for the skyscraper is increasingly an environmental one. As cities swell, building upward concentrates homes and workplaces on a small footprint, which limits the sprawl that eats farmland and forces long commutes. A well-designed tall building can be remarkably efficient, sharing structure, services and heat across many floors. Modern towers fold in energy-saving systems, natural ventilation, solar panels and planted terraces, and the more ambitious are mixed-use, stacking flats, offices, shops and gyms so they do not empty out at six in the evening like the single-purpose office slabs of the past. The skyscraper also carries economic and symbolic weight, anchoring business districts and becoming the silhouette by which a city is recognised the world over. Looking up at one is a small act of appreciation for collective ambition, much as other observances ask us to notice achievement and craft, from the cool indulgence of <a href="/specialdate/us-national-spumoni-day/">National Spumoni Day</a> to the quieter satisfactions marked on <a href="/specialdate/us-national-pots-de-creme-day/">National Pots de Crème Day</a>.</p>
<h2 id="the-engineering-of-staying-up">The engineering of staying up</h2>
<p>Building tall is less about supporting weight, which steel handles easily, than about resisting the wind, which is the real enemy of a very tall structure. A skyscraper behaves like a vertical cantilever, and the higher it goes the more it wants to sway and twist in a gale. Engineers fight this in several ways: by giving the building a stiff central core of concrete or braced steel, by tapering or twisting the profile so the wind cannot organise into a steady rhythm of pushes, and by fitting tuned mass dampers, enormous suspended counterweights that swing in opposition to the building’s movement and damp it out. Taipei 101’s golden 660-tonne steel ball, hung visibly between the 87th and 92nd floors and open to visitors, is the most famous example.</p>
<p>Other problems multiply with height. The lifts that made skyscrapers possible become a bottleneck in the tallest towers, since a single shaft cannot serve every floor efficiently; the answer is sky lobbies, where express lifts carry passengers to an intermediate level to change for local lifts, an idea pioneered in Chicago’s John Hancock Center and the original World Trade Center. Even the plumbing must be engineered in zones, because the water pressure that would serve a low floor would burst the pipes a hundred storeys down. Every one of these solutions is invisible to the person admiring the silhouette, which is part of what makes the buildings worth a day’s reflection.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-is-celebrated">How it is celebrated</h2>
<p>Skyscraper Day belongs to anyone who looks up. Architecture buffs and casual sightseers alike use it to visit an observation deck and take in a city from above, from the Empire State’s 86th floor to the Burj Khalifa’s At the Top experience on the 124th. Architecture enthusiasts join walking tours that trace a city’s towers and the styles that produced them, and photographers head out to shoot skylines, which then fill social media for the day. It is also a teaching occasion: museums, libraries and online resources tell the stories behind landmark buildings, the lives of the architects, and the engineering problems, especially wind, that had to be solved to make height safe.</p>
<h2 id="how-a-city-is-shaped-by-its-towers">How a city is shaped by its towers</h2>
<p>Skyscrapers do more than fill a skyline; they concentrate the character of a place. Manhattan’s grid of towers grew up partly because the island’s bedrock made deep foundations cheap and its land scarce made height economic, so geology and real estate together wrote the skyline. London resisted tall buildings for far longer, protecting sightlines to St Paul’s Cathedral by law, which is why its cluster of towers in the City, the Gherkin, the Shard, the Cheesegrater, arrived comparatively late and in a tightly defined zone. The contrast shows how much a city’s relationship with height is a matter of policy and culture, not just engineering. Asian and Gulf cities, building fast and from scratch, have embraced the tower with fewer constraints, which is why the centre of gravity of the skyscraper race moved east and south over the past three decades. The day is as good a moment as any to notice that a skyline is a kind of autobiography, written in steel by a city’s ambitions, anxieties and rules.</p>
<h2 id="fun-facts">Fun facts</h2>
<ul>
<li>The Home Insurance Building, widely called the first skyscraper, was only ten storeys tall, modest by today’s measure but revolutionary for hanging its walls on a steel frame.</li>
<li>The Chrysler Building’s architect secretly assembled a 56-metre spire inside the building and raised it through the roof to beat 40 Wall Street to the height record in 1930.</li>
<li>“Skyscraper” originally meant the tallest sail on a sailing ship, and was also slang for a tall person, long before it ever described a building.</li>
<li>The Burj Khalifa is so tall that people on its lower floors can watch the sun set, then take a lift upward and watch it set a second time from a higher floor.</li>
<li>Very tall towers are engineered to sway in high winds, and many contain a tuned mass damper, a huge counterweight, like Taipei 101’s 660-tonne steel ball, to steady them and keep occupants comfortable.</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="a-closing-reflection">A closing reflection</h2>
<p>The skyscraper is one of the few things humans build largely to prove that we can, and the height records that drive it have always been about more than office space. Yet the type has quietly become something more useful than a trophy: a practical answer to crowded cities and scarce land, an argument for living densely and lightly. The race to be tallest will doubtless continue, but the building’s real future may lie less in the record books than in how well it lets a growing, urban species share a small planet.</p>
Advertisement
Related Content
Advertisement
