International Day of Non-Violence
<p>On 12 March 1930, a thin man of sixty in a homespun loincloth walked out of the Sabarmati Ashram with seventy-eight volunteers and set off on foot towards the sea. Twenty-four days and 387 kilometres later, at the coastal village of Dandi, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi stooped, picked up a lump of natural salt left by the evaporating tide, and broke the law of the British Empire. He had paid no salt tax. The gesture was almost absurdly small, and it shook an empire. It is for this man, and for that kind of disciplined defiance, that 2 October is observed each year as the International Day of Non-Violence.</p>
<p>The date is no coincidence. Gandhi was born on 2 October 1869 in Porbandar, on the western coast of India, and the United Nations chose his birthday deliberately when it created the day. What the observance marks is not merely the memory of one person but a method: the idea that injustice can be confronted, and sometimes defeated, without raising a hand against an opponent.</p>
<h2 id="where-the-day-comes-from">Where the day comes from</h2><div class="ad-unit ad-in-article" aria-label="Advertisement">
<span class="ad-label">Advertisement</span>
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:block;text-align:center"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3726833845844946"
data-ad-slot="3291553914"
data-ad-format="auto"
data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script>
</div>
<p>The day is recent, even if the philosophy behind it is not. On 15 June 2007 the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 61/271, which established 2 October as the International Day of Non-Violence. The resolution was introduced by India, and when its Minister of State for External Affairs, Anand Sharma, presented it to the Assembly, he did so on behalf of 140 co-sponsoring states. That breadth of support was itself a statement: governments of very different politics and religions were willing to put their names to a day named, in effect, after Gandhi.</p>
<p>The resolution describes the day as an occasion to “disseminate the message of non-violence, including through education and public awareness”, and it reaffirms what it calls “the universal relevance of the principle of non-violence”. The language is careful, but the intent is plain. The United Nations was not endorsing a single national hero so much as adopting a working principle it believed had been tested in practice and found to work.</p>
<h2 id="the-man-and-the-method">The man and the method</h2>
<p>Gandhi did not invent the moral idea of refusing to harm others; the principle of <em>ahimsa</em>, non-injury, is far older than he was and runs through Jain, Hindu and Buddhist thought. What Gandhi did was turn it into a political technique. He gave it a name, <em>satyagraha</em>, which he translated loosely as “truth-force” or “soul-force”, and he treated it as something that had to be trained, organised and applied with discipline rather than felt as a vague sentiment.</p>
<p>His first large experiments came not in India but in South Africa, where he spent two decades fighting discriminatory laws against the Indian community. By the time he returned home he had a method ready to test on a far larger stage. In 1917, at Champaran in Bihar, he led indigo farmers in a campaign against the planters who exploited them, an early demonstration on Indian soil that organised, non-violent pressure could force concessions from the powerful.</p>
<p>The Salt March of 1930 was the technique at full stretch. Salt was a necessity that every Indian needed and that the colonial state taxed and monopolised, forbidding people even to collect it from their own shores. By walking to the sea and gathering salt, Gandhi chose a law that was both petty and universal, and broke it in the most public way imaginable. Tens of thousands followed his example along the coast; the prisons filled; the moral authority of the Raj cracked. India would not become independent until 15 August 1947, after years more of struggle, but the salt campaign had shown the world what unarmed resistance could do.</p>
<h2 id="what-the-day-argues">What the day argues</h2><div class="ad-unit ad-in-article" aria-label="Advertisement">
<span class="ad-label">Advertisement</span>
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:block;text-align:center"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3726833845844946"
data-ad-slot="3291553914"
data-ad-format="auto"
data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script>
</div>
<p>The quiet claim built into the International Day of Non-Violence is that non-violence is not weakness. The point bears repeating, because the philosophy is so often mistaken for passivity or for simply staying out of trouble. Gandhi meant almost the opposite. To stand in front of an armed authority, refuse to obey an unjust order, and accept the beating or the prison sentence without striking back demands a particular kind of nerve. It is confrontation stripped of its usual weapon.</p>
<p>The deeper argument is that violence tends to reproduce itself, while non-violence aims to break the cycle. An opponent met with force has every reason to answer with more force; an opponent met with calm, principled refusal is denied the justification of self-defence and is left, eventually, having to answer to conscience and to onlookers. Gandhi spoke of trying to convert rather than to coerce, of seeking to win over the adversary rather than to crush him. Whether that always works is a fair question, but the historical record he left is not easily waved away.</p>
<p>The day sits within a wider family of UN observances concerned with the many faces of harm, and they illuminate one another. The <a href="/specialdate/international-day-for-the-elimination-of-violence-against-women/">International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women</a> addresses a form of violence that often unfolds behind closed doors rather than in the street, while the <a href="/specialdate/day-of-remembrance-for-all-victims-of-chemical-warfare/">Day of Remembrance for All Victims of Chemical Warfare</a> confronts the industrialised cruelty of the battlefield. Set beside them, the case for non-violence reads less as an abstract ideal and more as a response to violence in all its registers, intimate and global alike.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-is-marked">How it is marked</h2>
<p>In India, 2 October is a national holiday observed as Gandhi Jayanti, and it carries the weight of a founding anniversary. The day begins with prayer meetings at Raj Ghat in New Delhi, the riverside memorial where Gandhi was cremated after his assassination in 1948, and the Prime Minister and other leaders lay garlands and offer tributes. Schools hold readings of his favourite hymns; communities organise <em>shramdaan</em>, voluntary collective labour, and acts of public service.</p>
<p>At the United Nations, the day is generally low-key but pointed, marked by panel discussions, lectures and statements that connect Gandhi’s example to current conflicts. The connection to Gandhi also makes the day a natural occasion for the heirs of his method, who have understood themselves as part of a single tradition. Martin Luther King Jr, who studied Gandhi’s writings closely and travelled to India in 1959, and the campaigners who dismantled apartheid in South Africa all drew on the same well, and commemorations frequently name them in the same breath.</p>
<h2 id="how-the-method-travelled">How the method travelled</h2>
<p>What gives the day its weight is that Gandhi’s approach did not stay in India. The clearest line runs to the United States, where the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s consciously adopted satyagraha as a strategy. King wrote that Gandhi had shown him how the ethic of love, which he had thought useful only between individuals, could become “a potent instrument for social and collective transformation”. The bus boycott in Montgomery, the lunch-counter sit-ins, the marches met with fire hoses and dogs, these were applications of a discipline worked out decades earlier on another continent: provoke the injustice into showing itself, absorb the blow without retaliating, and let the watching public draw its own conclusions.</p>
<p>The pattern repeated elsewhere. In the Philippines in 1986, the largely peaceful People Power movement forced out the Marcos dictatorship; in the closing years of the Soviet bloc, the “velvet” revolutions of 1989 toppled entrenched governments with strikes, demonstrations and mass refusal rather than gunfire. Scholars who have studied these episodes, notably the political scientists Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan, have argued from the historical record that non-violent campaigns have actually succeeded more often than violent ones, in part because they are easier for ordinary people to join. That finding gives the International Day of Non-Violence an empirical edge it might otherwise lack: it commemorates not just a noble ideal but a method with a measurable track record.</p>
<h2 id="fun-facts">Fun facts</h2>
<ul>
<li>Gandhi was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize five times, in 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947 and finally in 1948, the year of his death, yet he never received it; in 1948 the Nobel Committee made no award at all, later acknowledging that there was “no suitable living candidate”.</li>
<li>He set out from Sabarmati with 78 followers, but by the time he reached Dandi the column had swelled into a procession several kilometres long.</li>
<li>The resolution that created the International Day of Non-Violence had 140 co-sponsoring countries, one of the widest sponsorships any UN observance has attracted.</li>
<li>Gandhi’s preferred symbol of resistance was the <em>charkha</em>, the simple spinning wheel; spinning one’s own cloth was, in his eyes, an act of economic defiance against imported British textiles, which is why a spinning wheel once featured on the flag of the Indian National Congress.</li>
<li>Albert Einstein, a contemporary, wrote of him that “generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth”.</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="a-closing-reflection">A closing reflection</h2>
<p>There is a temptation to file Gandhi safely in the past, a saintly figure who belongs to the age of empire and black-and-white photographs. The date pushes back against that. By tying the day to a birthday rather than to a treaty or a battle, the United Nations framed non-violence as something carried by people rather than enshrined in documents, a practice that has to be relearned by each generation that decides to try it. The harder thought the day offers is that the method is always available and almost never easy. It asks the person who has been wronged to do the most counterintuitive thing of all: to refuse the satisfaction of striking back, and to trust that restraint will prove the stronger force.</p>
Advertisement
Related Content
Advertisement
