International Day of Charity
<p>When Mother Teresa died in Calcutta on 5 September 1997, the woman the world knew by that name had been born eighty-seven years earlier in Skopje as Anjezë Gonxhe Bojaxhiu, the daughter of an Albanian family in what was then the Ottoman Empire. She had spent nearly half a century running an order that washed the dying, fed the starving and asked very little about whether any of it was efficient. It is her death, rather than her birth or her sainthood, that the calendar marks: the United Nations chose 5 September for the International Day of Charity precisely because it was the day she died, anchoring a global observance to one recognisable life of service.</p>
<h2 id="where-the-day-comes-from">Where the day comes from</h2><div class="ad-unit ad-in-article" aria-label="Advertisement">
<span class="ad-label">Advertisement</span>
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:block;text-align:center"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3726833845844946"
data-ad-slot="3291553914"
data-ad-format="auto"
data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script>
</div>
<p>The idea did not originate at the UN but in Hungary. In 2011 the Hungarian parliament and government backed a civil-society initiative to create a day for charity, intended to raise the visibility of charitable work and to strengthen social responsibility and public support for giving. Hungary then carried the proposal to New York, and on 17 December 2012 the General Assembly adopted resolution 67/105, designating 5 September as the International Day of Charity. The first commemoration at UN headquarters followed on 5 September 2013, organised by Hungary’s permanent mission in cooperation with the UN Development Programme, the UN Foundation and the UN’s information department.</p>
<p>The decision to peg the day to Mother Teresa was deliberate. She had won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979 and remained, for believers and non-believers alike, a near-universal shorthand for self-denying service to the poor. By tying the observance to her death rather than to any single religious feast, the UN could honour a concrete example of dedicated charity while leaving the day open to every culture and creed that values giving.</p>
<h2 id="a-longer-history-of-the-impulse">A longer history of the impulse</h2>
<p>Mother Teresa’s own story gives the day its anchor, but the practice it celebrates is far older than any modern institution. She founded the Missionaries of Charity in Calcutta in 1950 with a handful of companions, after leaving the teaching convent where she had spent her early religious life. The order grew into a global network of homes for the dying, orphanages and clinics, and its plain white sari edged with three blue stripes became one of the most recognisable habits in the world. Pope Francis canonised her on 4 September 2016 in St Peter’s Square, the day before the anniversary of her death, so that her feast and the International Day of Charity now sit side by side in early September.</p>
<p>Organised giving, of course, predates her by millennia. The duty to give appears in the Hebrew concept of tzedakah, in the Islamic obligations of zakat and the voluntary sadaqah, in the Christian tradition of almsgiving and in the Buddhist practice of dāna. The earliest hospitals, hostels and poor-relief funds in the medieval Christian and Islamic worlds were charitable foundations long before the state took on welfare. What the modern day adds is not the impulse but the coordination: a shared date on which the scattered work of giving can be made visible at once.</p>
<p>The institutional form of charity that we now recognise has a traceable lineage too. The Islamic waqf, an endowment dedicated to a charitable purpose, sustained institutions such as the al-Qarawiyyin mosque-university founded in Fez in 859 and the great Mansuri hospital built in Cairo in 1284, both maintained for generations by charitable endowment. In England, the Statute of Charitable Uses of 1601, passed in the reign of Elizabeth I, set out a list of charitable purposes that still echoes in modern charity law, and the Victorian era saw an explosion of voluntary societies tackling everything from child labour to public health. The great relief organisations that now dominate humanitarian work, the Red Cross movement founded by Henry Dunant after the Battle of Solferino in 1859, Oxfam born out of wartime famine relief in 1942, and many others, grew from this same long tradition of organised compassion. The International Day of Charity does not invent any of this; it gathers it under a single date.</p>
<h2 id="why-it-matters">Why it matters</h2><div class="ad-unit ad-in-article" aria-label="Advertisement">
<span class="ad-label">Advertisement</span>
<ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:block;text-align:center"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-3726833845844946"
data-ad-slot="3291553914"
data-ad-format="auto"
data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script>
</div>
<p>The argument for a dedicated day is less about generating goodwill, which is rarely in short supply, than about directing attention to work that is by its nature quiet. Charitable organisations tend to reach exactly the people whom official institutions struggle to serve, responding with local knowledge and flexibility to needs that range from emergency relief after an earthquake to the slow business of running a food bank through a hard winter. Much of that labour is unpaid and unseen, and the day exists partly to credit it.</p>
<p>There is also a corrective edge to the observance, easy to miss beneath the language of generosity. The UN frames charity as a complement to development and to the work of governments, not a substitute for it, and the better commentary around the day stresses that giving can be done badly as well as well. Effective charity means directing support where it does the most good, favouring organisations that are transparent about where money goes, and treating recipients as people with agency rather than objects of pity. Mother Teresa herself was not exempt from this scrutiny; critics questioned the medical standards in her homes even as admirers defended her intentions. Holding both in view is part of what an honest day of charity should invite.</p>
<h2 id="how-it-is-observed">How it is observed</h2>
<p>There is no single ritual attached to 5 September, which suits a day meant to span every tradition. In practice it is marked by fundraising drives, volunteering pushes, awareness campaigns and community events. Charities time appeals to coincide with it and use it to thank donors and volunteers; schools and workplaces organise collections and giving activities. The UN and its agencies typically use the occasion to connect charitable action to the Sustainable Development Goals, the framework of targets the organisation has set for ending poverty and hunger.</p>
<p>In many places the day falls naturally alongside existing customs of almsgiving and mutual aid, so that the official observance overlaps with religious and communal practices that already exist. That overlap is part of its design: rather than impose a new ceremony, the day lends a common date to forms of giving that communities were already practising.</p>
<p>The day also tends to draw attention to the changing shape of generosity. The rise of online giving platforms, peer-to-peer fundraising and “giving days” such as the international GivingTuesday movement has made it far easier for ordinary people to contribute small sums to causes far from home, and the 5 September observance is increasingly used to spotlight these tools. At the same time, a counter-current of thinking, sometimes called effective altruism, has pressed donors to ask harder questions about which causes deliver the most good per pound or dollar given. Both developments fit comfortably within the day’s stated aim of encouraging not just more giving but better-directed giving, and they have given the observance a contemporary edge it lacked when first proposed.</p>
<h2 id="symbols-and-the-figure-at-the-centre">Symbols and the figure at the centre</h2>
<p>The day has no flag or emblem of its own; its symbol is a person. The image of Mother Teresa, small and stooped in her bordered sari, functions as the day’s visual shorthand for the idea that meaningful change can begin with humble, repeated acts rather than grand gestures. That choice of symbol carries an argument within it. A movement could have picked a wealthy benefactor or a vast foundation to represent charity; choosing a nun who owned almost nothing reframes giving as something measured in attention and persistence rather than in sums. The connection to deliberate, principled action also links the day to the wider UN tradition of observances built around human dignity, such as the <a href="/specialdate/international-day-of-happiness/">International Day of Happiness</a>, and to days that honour service in the cause of peace and development, like the <a href="/specialdate/international-day-of-sport-for-development-and-peace/">International Day of Sport for Development and Peace</a>.</p>
<h2 id="fun-facts">Fun facts</h2>
<ul>
<li>The date marks Mother Teresa’s death, not her birth; she was born on 26 August 1910, and her feast day in the Catholic calendar is the 5 September anniversary of her death.</li>
<li>The whole observance began as a Hungarian national initiative in 2011 before Hungary took it to the UN, where it became a global day a year later.</li>
<li>Mother Teresa was canonised on 4 September 2016, placing her sainthood ceremony one day before the International Day of Charity each year.</li>
<li>She was Albanian by heritage, born in Skopje in present-day North Macedonia, and became an Indian citizen, so the world’s emblem of charity belonged to three nations at once.</li>
<li>The word “charity” descends from the Latin caritas, meaning a self-giving love, which is why older translations of scripture render the famous passage as “the greatest of these is charity” rather than “love”.</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="a-closing-thought">A closing thought</h2>
<p>A day built around a single saint risks suggesting that charity is the work of extraordinary people, the rare individual willing to give everything. The more useful reading runs the other way. Mother Teresa’s homes were sustained not by heroism but by routine, by the unglamorous repetition of small tasks done daily for decades. If the day has a lesson, it is that generosity is less a matter of grand sacrifice than of attention sustained over time, and that the harder question is not whether to give but how to give in a way that genuinely helps. That question outlasts any single observance, and is rather the point of setting one aside.</p>
Advertisement
Related Content
Advertisement
