Contents

Two-Lane Blacktop: The Existential Car Film

Esquire called it the film of the year before anyone saw it; Universal buried it anyway

Contents

Nobody in Two-Lane Blacktop has a name. The credits list them as the Driver, the Mechanic, the Girl and GTO. Three of the four barely speak. The film follows a grey car east across America and ends without resolving the thing it appeared to be about, and in April 1971 Esquire put the complete screenplay on its cover and announced it as the film of the year.

Then it came out, and America did not go.

The Universal experiment

Advertisement

The context matters more than usual here, because Two-Lane Blacktop is one of the artefacts of a specific and short-lived corporate delusion. After Easy Rider, Universal ran a programme of low-budget pictures handed to young directors with something close to final cut — roughly a million dollars each, no interference, on the theory that the studio had no idea what the audience wanted and that the people who did looked like this. Dennis Hopper got one and made The Last Movie. Miloš Forman got one and made Taking Off. Monte Hellman got one and made this.

Hellman had form. He had shot two extraordinary cheap westerns back to back in Utah in 1966 — The Shooting and Ride in the Whirlwind, with Jack Nicholson and Warren Oates — films in which the genre’s furniture is present and its meaning has been quietly removed. He arrived at Two-Lane Blacktop with a fully formed idea about how to empty a genre while leaving the shell standing, and the road movie turned out to be more susceptible to it than the western had been.

Universal, having commissioned it, then declined to release it properly. The reputation was already ruined by the Esquire cover, which had promised a generational statement and delivered instead an appointment with ninety minutes of profound refusal.

The casting is the argument

James Taylor plays the Driver. Dennis Wilson, the Beach Boys’ drummer, plays the Mechanic. Neither was an actor. Laurie Bird, who plays the Girl, had never been in a film. Warren Oates, playing GTO, was one of the finest character actors alive.

That asymmetry is the entire design. Hellman cast the three young leads for face and stillness and then, by every account of the production, declined to give them the screenplay — pages were handed out as required, so the performers genuinely did not know where the story was going or what it meant. What you see on screen is three people who cannot act, in possession of no information, being photographed. It reads as an unbridgeable interiority. You cannot tell what the Driver is thinking, because there is nothing to tell.

Against them Hellman sets Oates, who is doing something entirely different and doing it brilliantly. GTO talks constantly. He picks up hitchhikers and tells each one a different story about who he is — a different job, a different tragedy, a different reason for being on the road — and he does this without any visible plan or profit. He is a man made entirely of narrative in a film that has decided narrative is a lie. The performance is very funny and increasingly unbearable, and Oates never once tips his hand about which story, if any, is true.

Why it works: the sound of nothing

Advertisement

There is no score. That decision is the film.

What you hear is a small engine, wind, tyre noise, the occasional radio, and a great deal of nothing. Hellman lets scenes run past their information — a fuel stop, a diner, a negotiation over money — and then simply keeps going. The film’s rhythm is mechanical. It is paced like a long drive, which is to say badly, which is the point.

The Chevrolet is the other masterstroke of production design as thesis. It is a 1955 model in bare primer, unpainted, visibly ugly, with an engine in it that could destroy almost anything on the road. Every visual instinct of American car culture — chrome, colour, the car as declaration — has been stripped away, leaving pure function. The men who drive it care about nothing else. They do not discuss it philosophically. They tune it, race it for money, and move on, and Hellman shoots the tuning with the attention another film would give to dialogue.

There is a genuinely good joke buried in the object’s afterlife: one of the ‘55 Chevys built for this film was later repainted black and put into American Graffiti, where it became the car Harrison Ford drives. The most nihilistic object in American cinema went straight into the most nostalgic film about the same era. Nothing about that is intentional and it is perfect anyway.

The race that isn’t

The plot, such as it is: the Driver and the Mechanic encounter GTO, and a wager is struck — a race east to Washington D.C., pink slips to the winner. This is a functioning premise. It has stakes, a destination and a clock, and a normal film would now proceed.

Two-Lane Blacktop proceeds to lose interest in it almost immediately. The race is honoured in patches and forgotten in others. The parties help each other. They stop. They drift. The Girl attaches herself to the group and moves between the men without any of it being weighted as romance or betrayal. The competition survives as a formality that everyone is too tired to cancel.

That evaporation is Hellman’s actual subject, and it is what separates this from every other road picture of its decade. The road film’s whole engine is that going somewhere means something. Hellman takes the promise seriously enough to build it and then demonstrates, at length, that the men who live on the road have no interior life for the destination to matter to. They race because racing is what happens next.

The real ancestor

Everyone files this under Easy Rider’s descendants for commercial reasons, and the influence is only financial. Hopper’s film has politics, a thesis and a martyrdom. Hellman has none of those and would regard all three as sentimental.

The true ancestor is Hellman’s own The Shooting — a western in which people ride toward a purpose the film refuses to disclose, and the landscape does the meaning-making that the characters cannot. Swap the horse for a Chevy and Two-Lane Blacktop is the same film. The American road movie is a western with the frontier closed, and Hellman is the only director of the period who seems to have understood that as a formal problem rather than a metaphor to mention in interviews.

Its siblings arrived within eighteen months and went at the same material from other angles. Vanishing Point gives its driver a backstory, a mythology and a radio prophet — everything Hellman withholds — and becomes an elegy. Electra Glide in Blue puts a policeman on the same roads and finds the same emptiness from the other side of the law. Zachariah, from the same year, tried to fill the void with philosophy and demonstrated why Hellman was right to leave it alone.

Downstream, the inheritance is enormous. Every subsequent film built on withheld interiority and long American distances — the road as a place where a crime film goes to think, Jarmusch’s early deadpan, most of the American independent cinema of the eighties — is working ground Hellman broke while Universal looked away.

The case against

It is boring. I want to be honest about that rather than smuggle it past you in the word “hypnotic”. Long stretches of Two-Lane Blacktop consist of a car on a road and people not talking, and the film’s defence — that the boredom is the argument — is true and does not make the minutes shorter. If you require a character to want something, this film will feel like a punishment administered by a very clever person.

The other fair objection is that the withholding is sometimes indistinguishable from the leads’ inability. Hellman is banking on the audience reading blankness as depth, and the bet does not always pay. Taylor in particular is a wall. Whether that wall is an artistic achievement or a musician who cannot act being pointed at by a camera is a question the film cannot settle, and Hellman’s genius is arguably that he found a structure where the answer stops mattering.

Laurie Bird made only a couple of further films — Hellman’s Cockfighter, and a small part in Annie Hall — and died in 1979, at twenty-five. Her performance here is the one that has aged best of the three, precisely because she seems to be the only young person on screen who has noticed the men are hollow.

Where to find it

It spent years unavailable because of music rights and has been properly restored since; it lives with the specialist labels and turns up on the repertory circuit paired with Vanishing Point. Watch it late, alone, on a large screen, and do not check your phone, because the film is a test of exactly that.

Spoilers below

The race is never resolved. There is no arrival in Washington, no pink slips, no winner. The competitors simply diffuse across the map, and the Girl leaves — walking away from the car and getting on the back of a stranger’s motorcycle, on no stated impulse, without a scene of decision. Hellman films her departure as an event of no more consequence than a fuel stop, which is the cruellest thing in the picture and the most truthful.

GTO’s last appearance is his best. He picks up two more hitchhikers and begins another story about himself, and this time the story he tells is the plot of the film we have been watching — he claims the Chevy, the race, the whole thing, as his own adventure. The man made of narrative has absorbed the actual events into his repertoire, where they will sit alongside all the invented ones, indistinguishable. It is the film’s only comment on itself and it is delivered as a lie told to strangers.

Then the ending, which is one of the few genuinely radical gestures in a studio-financed American film. The Chevy launches down a strip. The engine noise builds. And the image begins to slow — the frames dragging, then jamming, then catching, and the film itself burns through in the projector gate and whites out the screen.

It refuses the ending on the level of the material. There is no crash, no death, no reconciliation, no shot of a road disappearing into the distance while music swells. The medium simply fails, mid-acceleration, and the argument lands with a violence no narrative conclusion could achieve: this is a film about people with no inside, going nowhere, and the only honest way to stop is to stop being a film.

Universal had paid for that. You can see why they were unenthusiastic.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Magpie
Written by Magpie

vo.rs's screen critic. Magpie covers genre cinema — horror, sci-fi, cult, crime and the gloriously low-budget — as a collector who hoards references and connects a new film back to the forgotten one it's really descended from. Raised on the video-shop shelves, streaming-native now, and allergic to a spoiler above the fold. Expect argued verdicts, no star ratings, and a running list of three more things to watch.