Society (1989): The Body-Horror Satire With the Nastiest Ending

Brian Yuzna's debut spends an hour as a paranoid teen thriller before the flesh melts

Contents

Brian Yuzna’s Society (1989) is a film with a secret, and the secret is that it spends most of its running time pretending to be a much tamer movie. For an hour it plays as a moody, slightly stiff paranoid thriller about a Beverly Hills teenager who suspects his wealthy family is hiding something monstrous. The pacing wobbles, the acting varies, and a first-time viewer could be forgiven for wondering what the fuss is about. Then the last reel arrives, and the film unleashes one of the most deliriously repulsive climaxes in horror history, a set-piece so far beyond what the previous hour prepared you for that it retroactively rewrites everything you have watched. Society is a slow build with a nuclear payload, and the wait is the whole design.

Bill Whitney, played by Billy Warlock, is a popular, athletic high-schooler in the wealthiest tier of Beverly Hills, and he cannot shake the feeling that he does not belong to his own family. His parents and his sister seem subtly wrong. He hears a secret recording that suggests something incestuous and unspeakable happening at his sister’s coming-out party. His psychiatrist may be in on it. Friends who try to warn him die in convenient accidents. Everyone tells him he is paranoid, and the film keeps him and us off balance, never quite confirming whether Bill is uncovering a conspiracy or losing his mind, until it confirms it in the most emphatic way imaginable.

The slow burn is a trap being set

Advertisement

The craft that makes Society work is its patience, and understanding that patience is the key to forgiving the slower stretches. Yuzna, a producer making his directorial debut after backing Stuart Gordon’s Re-Animator and From Beyond, structures the film as a long, deliberate accumulation of unease. The horror is withheld almost entirely for the first two acts, kept to small wrongnesses, a body that bends the wrong way in a shower-door reflection, a family whose warmth feels rehearsed, conversations that curdle at the edges. The film is teaching you to distrust the smooth surfaces of wealth, and it needs you comfortable and slightly bored so that the eventual detonation feels like a betrayal by the film itself.

That structure is a genuine gamble, and it is why Society divides viewers. If the ending did not deliver, the slow burn would just be slow. Because the ending delivers to a degree almost nobody expects, the earlier restraint reads in hindsight as a con being carefully run on the audience, every bland dinner-table scene a fuse burning down. Yuzna is dressing the film in the drab clothes of a made-for-television thriller precisely so he can tear those clothes off in the last twenty minutes.

The payload is the work of Screaming Mad George, the Japanese-American surrealist and special-effects artist whose signature technique the film builds its climax around. His creations are not the usual latex gore. They are impossible, boneless, Dalí-esque transformations of the human body, flesh that flows and fuses and turns inside out, faces that migrate to the wrong parts of anatomy, bodies that melt into one another and pull apart like taffy. This is body horror as pure surrealist nightmare, and it is achieved with practical effects that still look startling because they are physically present in the room, wet and lit and impossible. The technique matters because the film’s central metaphor demands exactly this: a horror of bodies literally consuming other bodies.

The lineage: EC comics, Cronenberg, and the eat-the-poor satire

Here is where the collector reshelves the film. Society’s deepest ancestor is the class-conscious morality horror of the old EC comics, the Tales from the Crypt tradition where the rich and cruel got their comeuppance in a final-panel grotesque, and the whole film is essentially a feature-length EC story with the last panel expanded into an orgy of melting flesh. The literalised metaphor, the wealthy quite openly feeding on the poor, is exactly the kind of blunt, gleeful satire those comics ran on.

Its body-horror cousins are easy to name. The film shares a bloodline with David Cronenberg’s studies of the flesh in revolt, and it makes a natural pairing with the mechanical body-horror assault of Tetsuo: The Iron Man, Shinya Tsukamoto’s contemporary nightmare of bodies fusing with matter. Both films treat the human form as unstable, something that can be melted, merged and remade, and both arrive at horror through relentless physical transformation rather than jump scares. On the splatter-comedy side, it belongs beside Peter Jackson’s gleeful excess in Braindead and the splatter-comedy peak, which shares Society’s willingness to push practical gore past disgust and into a kind of delirious slapstick.

But its truest sibling is another Reagan-era melt movie with a class thesis. Set Society beside Street Trash and the melt movie as Reagan-era fable and you have two 1980s American horror films obsessed with dissolving bodies as a comment on a decade of yawning inequality. Street Trash melts the homeless; Society is the mirror image, revealing that the rich are the real monsters, a separate species who have been farming the poor all along. Both use the era’s practical-effects boom to make an economic argument you can feel in your stomach.

Does the satire earn the shock?

Advertisement

The honest objection is that Society is clumsy for most of its length, that the acting is uneven, the pacing baggy, the plotting mechanical, and that the film is coasting on the promise of its finale. All of that is fair. Watched as a conventional thriller, the first hour is minor work, competent and a little dull, and viewers who bail before the last reel will wonder what anyone sees in it.

My defence is that the crudeness is load-bearing. Society is a punk provocation with a single overwhelming idea, and the idea, that the ruling class is a literal predatory species that consumes the people beneath it, is delivered with a directness that a slicker film would have blunted. The satire is not subtle and it is not trying to be. Yuzna wants the metaphor as bald and as physically revolting as possible, and the film’s rough edges are part of its underground charge, the sense of a movie made outside the rules that would have sanded the horror down. As a delivery system for one unforgettable image, it is ruthlessly effective.

The verdict: it is a flawed, patient, gloriously nasty piece of class horror with one of the most extreme and inventive climaxes the genre has ever produced, and a debut that announced Yuzna as a real practical-effects visionary. Come for the paranoid thriller. Endure, at the end, the shunt.

Where to find it: it has an excellent restored physical release from Arrow and turns up on the cult-horror streaming services. Do not read too much about the ending first. Go in cold and let it detonate.

Spoilers below

The revelation is that Bill’s family, and the entire upper crust of Beverly Hills, are a separate species who have been living among ordinary humans for generations and quietly harvesting them. Bill was adopted, a human raised among them as fresh stock, groomed for the day he would either join or be consumed. His paranoia was correct in every particular, and the film’s long tease of “is he imagining it” pays off as a flat confirmation that the horror is entirely real and worse than he guessed.

The climax is the shunt, a ritual orgy in which the wealthy gather to feed. Their bodies liquefy and merge, flowing into one another in a writhing communal mass, and they envelop a victim, absorbing him entirely through the skin while he is still alive, digesting him into the collective. Screaming Mad George’s effects turn the sequence into a nightmare of impossible anatomy, hands emerging from mouths, faces stretched across torsos, the boundary between one body and the next erased. It is grotesque comedy and genuine horror at once, an aristocratic feast staged as a surrealist painting come to slobbering life.

The nastiest single image is saved for Bill’s confrontation with Mr. Benjamin, the leader, who reaches into himself and turns his own body inside out, and the film’s final movement gives Bill a strange, triumphant escape after his friend and the mysterious girl who has protected him help him turn the ritual against his tormentors. The last scene is almost breezy, Bill driving off having survived and even, in a grim joke, having pulled a length of another creature’s viscera from his own body as a keepsake. The film ends on a punk shrug rather than on despair, the message being that the rich really are a different species eating the rest of us, and the best a human can hope for is to crawl out of the party alive.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Magpie
Written by Magpie

vo.rs's screen critic. Magpie covers genre cinema — horror, sci-fi, cult, crime and the gloriously low-budget — as a collector who hoards references and connects a new film back to the forgotten one it's really descended from. Raised on the video-shop shelves, streaming-native now, and allergic to a spoiler above the fold. Expect argued verdicts, no star ratings, and a running list of three more things to watch.