Contents

Titanfall 2: The Best Campaign Nobody Bought

Respawn built a shooter campaign out of prototypes, then EA dropped it into the worst three weeks of 2016

Contents

Titanfall 2 came out on 28 October 2016. Battlefield 1 had arrived on 21 October. Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare landed on 4 November. Respawn’s game was released by EA into a fourteen-day gap between EA’s own military shooter and the biggest annual shooter on earth, and it was flattened. Patrick Söderlund, then running EA Studios, said publicly the following year that the timing had hurt the game and that they had misjudged it. That is the whole tragedy in one paragraph, and it is the reason the game is now shorthand for a certain kind of industry injustice.

Nine years on, the injustice framing has calcified into a meme, which does the game a disservice. Titanfall 2’s campaign survives on its own merits: it does something structurally unusual that almost nobody has copied since, and the reason nobody has copied it is that it is expensive, wasteful, and hard. The bad luck is a footnote to a design worth studying.

One mechanic per level, then bin it

Advertisement

The standard shooter campaign teaches you a verb in hour one and spends the next seven hours escalating it. More enemies, bigger rooms, a boss. Titanfall 2 does the opposite: each level introduces a mechanic, extracts a single good idea from it, and throws it away before you get bored.

You get a level where the terrain itself is the assembly line: a factory that builds rooms in front of you as you move through them, so the level is being constructed at the speed you traverse it. You get a level built around a time-shift device that flips you between two eras of the same facility with a button press, where the enemies, the geometry and the light all change and your momentum does not. You get a gauntlet — a speed-run training course with a leaderboard, sitting inside a campaign, teaching you your own movement by timing it.

Respawn has been open about how this came about: the team built playable prototypes first, small self-contained toys, and then designed levels around the ones that felt good. The time-shift level, “Effect and Cause”, came out of that process under designer Mohammad Alavi. The result is a campaign that reads like a compilation album, and it is short — five or six hours — precisely because a mechanic gets one level and then leaves.

This is a real design position, and it costs money. Every one of those toys is bespoke engineering for a single level, thrown away afterwards. It is why the game has no filler and also why nobody in a boardroom wants to greenlight it. A campaign built this way cannot amortise its costs across a sequel. Compare Doom Eternal: The Shooter as Puzzle, where id built one economy and spent eighteen hours proving it. Both are disciplined. Only one is repeatable.

Why the movement is the actual argument

The mechanics-per-level structure gets the headlines. The thing underneath it is better.

Pilot movement in Titanfall 2 is a wall-run, a double jump, and a slide that preserves speed, and the crucial property is that none of them are on a cooldown or a meter. Chaining them is a matter of the level agreeing to be chained. So every space in the game is authored twice — once for a player walking through it and once for a player who never touches the floor — and the design’s whole character comes from that second reading.

What this produces is a feeling almost nothing else in the genre offers: the levels are legible as movement. You look at a room and you see a route rather than a set of cover positions. When the time-shift level asks you to jump between eras mid-wall-run, the reason it works is that both eras were built to be run through, so the switch never breaks the line you are drawing through the space.

The Titan half is the counterweight, and it is smarter than it looks. BT-7274 is slow, heavy, and armed with loadouts you swap by taking them off dead Titans, and the deliberate friction after twenty minutes of pilot movement is what makes both halves read. A game that was all wall-running would flatten into noise inside an hour. The campaign alternates the two registers relentlessly — light and fast, then heavy and considered — and the rhythm is the reason six hours never sags.

There is a design lesson here that the industry mostly ignored: the pleasure of mobility depends on periodically taking it away.

The one that got away

Advertisement

Titanfall 2’s time-shift level shipped two weeks before Dishonored 2 (11 November 2016), which contains “A Crack in the Slab”, a level built on the same idea — a device that flips you between two time periods of the same building. Two studios, parallel development, no possibility of copying, both landing the trick in a fortnight of each other. It is one of the strangest coincidences in level-design history, and the fact that both are widely considered their game’s best level suggests the idea was simply sitting there waiting for hardware that could hold two versions of a space in memory at once.

The genuine ancestor of “one bespoke mechanic per chapter” is older: Half-Life (Valve, 1998), which introduced a set piece, resolved it, and moved on, and whose sequel built a physics toy and then spent a chapter on the gravity gun before dropping it. Respawn’s team came out of Infinity Ward, which came out of 2015 Inc., which made Medal of Honor: Allied Assault — a lineage that has been building scripted, single-use spectacle since 2002. Titanfall 2 is what that tradition looks like when the spectacle is handed to the player as a system rather than played at them as a cutscene.

What went wrong, and what happened after

The release window is the famous part. The less famous part is the aftermath. Respawn’s multiplayer — free maps for everyone, no season pass carving up the population — was the most player-friendly network model any big publisher shipped that year, and it was undermined for years by sustained attacks on the servers that left matchmaking unreliable or unusable for long stretches. A community project, Northstar, eventually stood up unofficial servers so people could play. EA rolled out fixes in 2024 that restored official matchmaking. That an eight- year-old shooter needed rescuing twice, once by its players and once by its publisher, is a fair summary of how the game has been treated.

EA acquired Respawn in 2017. The studio then made Apex Legends, set in the same universe, released it in February 2019 with no announcement, and it became one of the biggest games in the world. Every wall-run and double jump in Titanfall 2 is money that eventually arrived, just wearing a different hat.

The verdict

The campaign is six hours long and has no fat on it whatsoever, and that is a genuinely rare sentence to be able to write about a AAA shooter. The mechanics are disposable by design, the movement is the best in the genre, the pacing between pilot and Titan is exact, and the whole thing is over before it can disappoint you. Its reputation as the great lost shooter is deserved on the merits and has nothing to do with the release date.

The reservations are real. The story is thin — competent, warm, thin — and the emotional weight it goes for in the last hour is doing a lot of work on very little setup. The Titan boss fights against the Apex Predators are the least interesting encounters in the game, arriving on a schedule and reading as a different, more ordinary shooter’s idea of structure. And six hours is six hours; the campaign gives you a movement system that only becomes properly expressive around hour four.

It is on PC, PlayStation and Xbox, it is old enough to be permanently cheap, and it runs on everything. The campaign alone justifies it.

What to play next: Doom Eternal: The Shooter as Puzzle for the opposite structural bet — one system, endlessly deepened — and Metroid Dread: The Series Remembers What It Is for another design that treats mobility as the thing being authored rather than the way you get to the authoring.

Spoilers below

“Effect and Cause” is the level everyone names, and it deserves it, but the better piece of design is “Into the Abyss” — the factory that assembles the level in front of you. It is the game’s thesis made physical: the space is being authored at the speed you move, and you are outrunning your own level designer.

BT’s ending works despite the setup being thin, and the reason is mechanical rather than narrative. You have spent six hours climbing into and out of BT, being caught by BT, being thrown by BT across gaps you could not cross alone. The throw is a verb you have executed dozens of times. When the last one comes, the game asks you to perform an action you have internalised, one final time, with a different meaning attached — the feeling arrives through your hands, having been rehearsed for six hours under another name. That is what games can do that film cannot, and Respawn got there through a mechanic they had been quietly teaching since level two.

The Ark and the Fold Weapon plot is disposable. Nobody remembers it. Everybody remembers the throw.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Jay
Written by Jay

vo.rs's games critic. Jay covers the medium as a system rather than a spectacle — this month's release, the indie nobody bought, and the Amiga game it's quietly descended from — asking what a mechanic makes you feel and why the loop holds. Learned to wait through a C64 tape load, never stopped playing since, and still finishes the odd 60-hour RPG out of spite. Expect argued verdicts, no score ever, spoilers below the line, and a running list of older games worth your weekend.