Contents

Permadeath and the Stories It Buys

Rogue deleted your save file when you loaded it, and invented a narrative device by accident

Contents

Rogue deleted your save file when you loaded it.

That’s the whole argument, in one line of 1980 housekeeping. Michael Toy and Glenn Wichman were students at UC Santa Cruz with a dungeon game on a shared BSD machine, and the save existed so you could stop playing and go to a lecture. It was never a promise about your dungeon. So the file went on load, the loophole closed, and what they’d actually built was the most powerful narrative device this medium has ever produced on a budget of zero bytes.

What irreversibility does to a decision

Advertisement

Take any interesting choice in a game and ask what it costs to be wrong. If the answer is eleven seconds and a function key, the choice is a quiz question. You try the door; the door is bad; you un-try the door. What you experienced was a menu. What you remember is nothing.

Permadeath changes the type of the decision. You stop selecting the right answer and start committing under uncertainty to an outcome you’ll have to live in. That is what a story is made of. The drama, the regret, the anecdote you inflict on colleagues — all of it falls out for free once the record is fixed.

Which is why save systems are ideology. A quicksave key is a statement about whether your decisions are allowed to be real.

Naming is the trap, and the trap is deliberate

X-COM: UFO Defense, 1994, Julian Gollop’s design, MicroProse on the box, and the first thing everybody did was rename the squad. The game generates rookies with random names and puts a rename field right there in the barracks. That field cost an afternoon to implement and it is the cruellest piece of design in the game. You put your friends in it. Then you put your friends on a Skyranger and fly them into a night terror mission where the fog of war is total and the aliens fire during your turn, because reaction fire is a thing you spend Time Units to deserve and rookies never have enough.

You lose people. The soldier with sixty missions and maxed reactions — the one you’d stopped thinking of as a unit — dies to a lucky roll on turn two, and the log records it in the same colour as everything else.

The stats do the real damage, and they do it in a specific way: X-COM soldiers improve through use. Accuracy, bravery, reactions, Time Units, all of it climbs with missions survived. So the soldier you’d least like to lose is the one you send through the door first, every time, because they’re the only one you trust to survive what’s behind it. The tension machine isn’t the aliens. It’s that competence and exposure are the same variable, and the game knew that in 1994.

Permadeath makes cowards

Advertisement

Here’s the cost, and it catches most designs that reach for the mechanic because it sounds hardcore.

If loss is permanent and unbounded, the optimal play is to do nothing. Creep. Peek. Save the grenade. Decline every fight you might lose. Permadeath left unattended produces the dullest possible game, because it makes cowardice rational.

Every design that gets real drama out of it solves this the same way, with a clock that makes standing still lethal.

Darkest Dungeon (Red Hook, 2016) has the torch. Light burns down as you explore; low light means nastier ambushes and better loot, so the dungeon is a dial you set between safe and profitable. Behind that sits Stress, which accumulates, cracks your party into afflictions, and costs weeks of hamlet time to treat — weeks you’re paying for in gold you don’t have. Nothing in that game lets you stand still.

FTL (Subset Games, 2012) has the rebel fleet: an advancing red stain on the sector map. You want every beacon, because beacons are scrap and scrap is the only thing between you and the flagship. The fleet eats the map behind you at a fixed rate. Every jump prices your greed. And the save is single-slot and deleted on load — Rogue’s trick, thirty-two years on, in a game about a spaceship.

X-COM has the funding council. Miss enough UFOs and nations withdraw their money, and the arithmetic ends your campaign months before the aliens manage it.

The clock is the counterweight. Permadeath makes you cautious, the clock makes caution expensive, and the good play lives in the gap. Risk of Rain 2 is blunt enough to put the thing on screen: the difficulty curve is literally a clock, ticking from Easy to HAHAHA while you decide whether to open one more chest.

Bones

NetHack has been in continuous development since 1987, and it contains the most remarkable permadeath feature ever shipped: bones files. When you die, the game may pickle the level you died on — your corpse, your possessions, the thing that killed you — and drop the whole arrangement into a different player’s game. Someone you will never meet descends to level twelve, finds a dead wizard, finds the wizard’s kit lying in the dust, and finds that the killer hasn’t left.

That’s permadeath paying rent twice. The run ends, and the wreckage becomes somebody else’s dungeon. Nobody authored that level. You did, by failing on it.

The opt-in version is a different product

There’s a whole category of permadeath that works differently, and it’s worth separating out: the mode you tick.

Diablo II shipped Hardcore in 2000 — same game, one flag, dead is dead, and the character sits on your account as a corpse forever. Minecraft has Hardcore. RimWorld calls its version Commitment mode and autosaves over you so you can’t reload. Fire Emblem has Classic. In every case the game exists in both states and you chose.

That choice changes what the mechanic means. When permadeath is the only option, it’s a claim the design is making about reality. When it’s a toggle, it’s a badge — a difficulty setting with a social component, because the reason to tick it is partly to have ticked it. Both are legitimate. They produce different play: the opt-in crowd optimises hard and plays conservatively, because they signed up for the badge and the badge is the win condition.

Into the Breach (Subset Games, 2018) went at the whole idea sideways and I still think it’s the cleverest answer anyone’s found. You lose an island, the world falls, and one pilot goes back through time to a fresh timeline carrying their experience. Permadeath and continuity in the same object, structurally, in the fiction. Subset also made every enemy telegraph its exact move on your turn — no hidden information at all — so a loss is never bad luck. It’s yours, it’s legible, and the game hands you a mechanism to try again that costs the world.

What it actually buys

Be clear about this, because the marketing never is: permadeath is not difficulty. You could ship a permadeath game that’s trivially easy and it would still play differently from the same game with saves, because the mode of engagement changed underneath. It’s a claim about persistence. This run is the only copy.

What the claim buys is authorship. The player wrote the run, because the player was unable to edit it. Every Dwarf Fortress story anyone has ever told you — the community’s actual slogan is Losing is fun — is a simulation reacting to a decision that couldn’t be withdrawn. Allow the withdrawal and the anecdote evaporates, because you’d have told the version where it worked, and that version is boring. The loop is the argument, and irreversibility is what gives the loop something to argue with.

It’s also the crack that roguelites went straight through. If the run is the only copy, the run has to be worth something by itself. Meta- progression answers by making the account the thing that persists, which turns the run into a shift at the mine. That’s a real trade, it sells in volume, and it’s a different trade from the one Rogue made.

At the far end sits Pathologic (Ice-Pick Lodge, 2005), which starts a twelve-day clock and lets a town die around you at a pace you can slow and never stop. It’s a game that wants you to lose, and it’s the only honest place this line of thinking ends up.

The archer

Fire Emblem shipped Casual mode — defeated units return next chapter — in Japan in 2010 and internationally with Awakening in 2012, and Awakening’s sales are the reason there’s still a Fire Emblem; Intelligent Systems went in expecting it to be the last one. I won’t sneer at that. Casual mode sells you the plot, which is a perfectly good thing to sell, and it saved a series.

Classic mode sells you your plot. The one where the archer you’d fed twenty chapters of kills gets one-shotted by a wyvern rider because you got greedy on turn four and left her on a forest tile with three movement of exposure. There’s no version of that story where she lives. That’s the entire product.

Rogue’s save file deleted itself in 1980 because a university machine had a cheating problem. Forty-four years later, the most expensive thing in this medium is still a decision you can’t take back, and it still costs nothing to implement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Jay
Written by Jay

vo.rs's games critic. Jay covers the medium as a system rather than a spectacle — this month's release, the indie nobody bought, and the Amiga game it's quietly descended from — asking what a mechanic makes you feel and why the loop holds. Learned to wait through a C64 tape load, never stopped playing since, and still finishes the odd 60-hour RPG out of spite. Expect argued verdicts, no score ever, spoilers below the line, and a running list of older games worth your weekend.