Contents

God of War (2018): The Reboot That Put the Camera on a Father and a Son

Santa Monica Studio traded button-mashing spectacle for a single unbroken shot, and the restraint became the whole redesign

Contents

Santa Monica Studio released God of War on PlayStation 4 on 20 April 2018, a soft reboot of a series that had run five entries deep in Greek mythology across the PS2 and PS3 eras, relocating Kratos to Norse myth and, more importantly, giving him a son. The marketing led with the new setting. The actual redesign is a camera that never cuts, running from the opening shot to the credits as a single continuous take, and every other change in the game exists because that one decision forced it to.

Why the one-shot camera works

Advertisement

The original trilogy’s camera was fixed and theatrical, pulling back for scale during a boss fight, cutting to a new angle for a quick-time execution, editing the action the way a film would. The 2018 game removes all of that. The camera sits close over Kratos’ shoulder and never leaves, never cuts to a loading screen, never jumps forward in time without showing the transition. That constraint is punishing to build around — every combat encounter, every puzzle, every conversation has to resolve in the same continuous space the camera occupies — and Santa Monica Studio commits to it completely rather than treating it as a marketing hook broken the moment it becomes inconvenient.

The payoff is that the game stops feeling like a series of directed setpieces strung together and starts feeling like something happening to two specific people in a specific place. When Kratos and Atreus walk from their home to the lake at the game’s opening, the camera holds on their backs the entire way, and the silence between them communicates more about their relationship than the previous games managed with an entire trilogy of monologuing. The camera isn’t decoration. It’s the mechanism that makes the father-son structure legible at all.

Combat: weight over spectacle

Kratos trades his twin Blades of Chaos — still present, now a secondary weapon — for the Leviathan Axe as his primary tool, a weapon that can be thrown, recalled with a press of a button, and frozen into enemies to open follow-up combos. The axe’s throw-and-recall loop is the clearest single mechanical idea in the redesign: it forces spacing decisions a chain-weapon game never had to ask for, since throwing the axe means briefly fighting unarmed until it’s recalled, trading damage output for positioning. Combat overall runs slower and heavier than the earlier trilogy’s spectacle-combo carnage, trading QTE-driven executions for a more grounded, RPG-adjacent system with gear, runic attacks and a levelling curve — a shift that some longtime series fans read as a loss of identity and that this desk reads as the correct trade for a game built around sustained, close-quarters intimacy rather than button-mashing scale.

Spartan Rage, a meter that fills through sustained combat and unleashes a temporary berserker state where Kratos abandons his weapons for bare-handed damage, is the game’s release valve for the character’s older, more violent instincts, and its placement is deliberate: it’s strongest, and most satisfying, precisely when a fight has dragged on long enough that the player wants the old Kratos back. Using it too early wastes the meter; saving it for a boss fight’s final stretch turns a war of attrition into a finishing move, which gives the mechanic a genuine skill expression rather than functioning as a simple panic button.

Atreus as a system, not an escort quest

Advertisement

Escort companions in action games are usually a tax on the player’s patience — an AI-controlled character who needs protecting, interrupts combat with vulnerability, and rarely contributes meaningfully to a fight. Atreus avoids that fate by being genuinely useful from the opening hours: a bow that can be commanded mid-combo to stagger an enemy, upgraded across the campaign with different arrow types that open tactical options rather than just raw damage. He’s never a liability the player has to babysit, which matters enormously for a game whose entire emotional thesis depends on the player wanting Atreus around rather than tolerating him.

The puzzles, and the world as a single space

Because the camera never cuts, the world design has to hold together as one legible space rather than a series of disconnected arenas, and the Lake of Nine — the game’s central hub, revisited and reshaped as the story unlocks new paths — is the clearest expression of that discipline. Puzzles lean on the Leviathan Axe’s freezing property and Atreus’ ability to shoot mechanisms Kratos can’t reach, turning traversal itself into a light puzzle system rather than a corridor between combat rooms. None of it is particularly difficult by the standards of a dedicated puzzle game, but the puzzles aren’t the point — they’re the connective tissue that makes the one-shot conceit feel earned rather than gimmicky.

Mimir, and exposition solved by a talking head

Norse mythology is dense enough that a game built around it faces a real problem: how to deliver lore without stopping the action for a cutscene every time a name needs explaining. Santa Monica Studio’s solution is Mimir, a decapitated god’s head that Kratos carries strapped to his belt for a large stretch of the campaign, delivering worldbuilding and dry commentary in real time while the player walks, rows a boat, or fights. It’s a genuinely elegant answer to an exposition problem most mythology-adjacent games solve with codex entries nobody reads, because Mimir’s lore is inseparable from the moment-to-moment world rather than filed away in a menu, and his running commentary on Kratos and Atreus’ relationship does double duty as characterisation neither man would offer about himself.

The ancestor: this is Ico’s companion design, scaled up

The clearest systems ancestor for Atreus isn’t another God of War game — it’s Ico’s hand-holding companion mechanic, where a much smaller character depends on the player-controlled protagonist for physical safety and the bond between them is communicated almost entirely through movement rather than dialogue. Santa Monica’s version inverts the vulnerability — Atreus can fight, and eventually fights well — but keeps the emotional architecture: a player who has spent hours physically walking alongside a character develops an investment no amount of scripted dialogue alone would produce. The one-shot camera is what lets that Ico-derived bond read at all, since a game that kept cutting away from Kratos and Atreus walking together would never let the relationship accumulate the way it needs to. The rowing sections, silent stretches where father and son cross the Lake of Nine by boat, are the clearest lift from that lineage — long, unhurried, and doing narrative work through proximity rather than plot.

Gear, runes and the RPG scaffolding underneath

Armour sets, enchantments and runic attacks tied to the Blades of Chaos and Leviathan Axe give the combat a genuine build layer without tipping into loot-game bloat — each piece of gear changes a specific stat trade-off (resist versus luck versus strength) rather than presenting a wall of numbers to parse. Skill trees for both weapons unlock combo extensions gradually enough that the moveset still feels like it’s growing in the game’s final hours rather than front-loaded and forgotten, which keeps combat interesting across a campaign that otherwise leans on repeated enemy types in its middle stretch — Draugr and Nightmares recur often enough by the midpoint that the encounter variety has to come from the player’s expanding toolkit rather than new opponent design.

The honest limits of the redesign

The commitment to a single take occasionally works against the game’s own pacing: fast travel exists but is deliberately clunky, routed through mystical portals rather than an instant menu, and a handful of fetch-quest side content — the Nine Realms’ favour missions especially — leans on padding out the Lake of Nine’s map rather than introducing genuinely new ideas. Kratos’ own emotional arc, a man trying not to become his own explosive father, is compelling precisely because the game trusts silence to carry it, but that same restraint occasionally reads as withholding during stretches where a clearer window into his internal state would have helped a first-time player track what’s actually changing in him.

Where to play it

The 2018 game runs natively on PS4 and, via a free performance patch, on PS5 with a choice between a resolution mode and a higher framerate mode; a PC port followed in January 2022 with unlocked framerates and ultrawide support, and remains the most flexible way to play it now. There is no Xbox or Switch release — the series stays a PlayStation exclusive throughout this era — and the PC version is the one to pick if uncapped performance matters more than playing on the console the series calls home.

A crowded year for PlayStation exclusives

God of War arrived in the same 2018 stretch as Insomniac’s Marvel’s Spider-Man, and the two games make an instructive contrast in how a first-party Sony studio can reinvent a known quantity: Insomniac built an entirely new open-world traversal verb around an existing hero, while Santa Monica Studio rebuilt Kratos from the camera outward without changing the genre he lives in at all. Both approaches worked, and both shipped the same year, which says something about how much room PlayStation’s first-party slate had for genuinely different design bets rather than one house style repeated across every exclusive.

The verdict

God of War earns its reboot status by making a single formal choice — never cut away — and building every other system in service of it, rather than announcing a fresh coat of Norse paint over an unchanged action game. The result reads less like a spectacle title and more like a two-hander stage play that happens to include axe-throwing, which is exactly the tonal shift the series needed after five games of the same fixed camera and the same rage. Anyone curious where the studio took this design next should read this desk’s take on Ragnarök’s own combat and script, which argues the sequel’s craft outpaced its restraint in the opposite direction; anyone chasing the same close, personal camera trick in an unrelated genre should note how rarely a big-budget action game commits to it this fully.

Spoilers below

The game’s final revelation — that the mountain Kratos and Atreus have been climbing to scatter Faye’s ashes is Jötunheim, and that Atreus is himself the prophesied Loki of Norse myth, destined for a role in Ragnarök — recontextualises every earlier scene of Atreus reading runes he somehow already half-understands. Baldur, the game’s antagonist, is revealed as Odin’s son cursed against feeling pain, a condition his mother Freya wove to protect him and that has left him unable to feel anything at all; his death at Kratos and Freya’s hands in the finale, delivered while Freya begs Kratos to spare him, is the moment that sets up her open hostility toward Kratos across the sequel. The credits scene, showing Thor’s shadow arriving at the house, confirms the Norse pantheon’s gods are already watching the family the moment the credits roll, a promise the sequel spends its entire runtime cashing in.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Jay
Written by Jay

vo.rs's games critic. Jay covers the medium as a system rather than a spectacle — this month's release, the indie nobody bought, and the Amiga game it's quietly descended from — asking what a mechanic makes you feel and why the loop holds. Learned to wait through a C64 tape load, never stopped playing since, and still finishes the odd 60-hour RPG out of spite. Expect argued verdicts, no score ever, spoilers below the line, and a running list of older games worth your weekend.