<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Crime - vo.rs</title><link>https://vo.rs/categories/crime/</link><description>Latest from the Crime desk at vo.rs.</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vo.rs/categories/crime/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Branded to Kill: Suzuki's Hit-Man Film That Got Him Sacked</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/branded-to-kill-suzukis-hit-man-film-that-got-him-sacked/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In 1967 a Japanese studio director named Seijun Suzuki delivered a black-and-white gangster picture to his employers at Nikkatsu, and it cost him his career. The studio boss, Kyusaku Hori, watched &lt;em&gt;Branded to Kill&lt;/em&gt;, declared it incomprehensible and unprofitable, and fired the man who made it. Suzuki, who had cranked out roughly forty programme pictures for Nikkatsu on tight budgets and tighter schedules, found himself blacklisted from the industry for the better part of a decade. He sued the studio and eventually won, but the years in the wilderness were real. He had been sacked, essentially, for making a film that was too much itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Third Man: The Zither, the Sewers, and the Best Entrance in Film</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/the-third-man-the-zither-the-sewers-and-the-best-entrance-in-film/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a moment, roughly two-thirds of the way through Carol Reed&amp;rsquo;s 1949 &lt;em&gt;The Third Man&lt;/em&gt;, that every book about cinema eventually reaches for. A man has been standing in a darkened Vienna doorway, unseen. A neighbour&amp;rsquo;s window opens, light spills across the street, and the beam catches a face — amused, unbothered, caught doing exactly what it was doing. Orson Welles&amp;rsquo;s Harry Lime has been dead for the entire film up to this point, mourned, discussed, investigated. And here he is, alive, smirking, discovered by an accident of light. It is the most famous entrance in the medium, and it works because Reed made the audience wait an hour for it, building a man out of other people&amp;rsquo;s stories before letting him arrive to contradict them all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Chinatown: The Noir That Poisoned Its Own Ending</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/chinatown-the-noir-that-poisoned-its-own-ending/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert Towne wanted a different ending. His screenplay for &lt;em&gt;Chinatown&lt;/em&gt; — often cited as the finest ever written, and it is hard to argue — gave his detective a version of a win. Roman Polanski, directing, refused it. He had come out of the murder of his wife and the general conviction that the world does not reward the good, and he insisted the film close on catastrophe. The two men fought about it, and Polanski won, and the reason &lt;em&gt;Chinatown&lt;/em&gt; endures where a hundred handsome period thrillers have faded is that the director poisoned the well on purpose. The film is built like a satisfying mystery and then denies you the satisfaction, and that denial is the whole point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blood Simple: The Coens' Debut and the Perfect Small Crime</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/blood-simple-the-coens-debut-and-the-perfect-small-crime/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The title comes from Dashiell Hammett. In &lt;em&gt;Red Harvest&lt;/em&gt;, &amp;ldquo;blood simple&amp;rdquo; is the addled, panicky state a person falls into after committing a murder — the moment the mind stops working and instinct takes the wheel. Joel and Ethan Coen took the phrase for their 1984 debut because the whole film is an experiment in that condition. Four people commit or react to a killing, and every one of them acts on a wrong picture of what happened. The audience holds the only complete version, and the horror of the film is watching characters make lethal decisions on bad information while we sit above them, helpless, knowing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>David Fincher: The Procedural as Obsession</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/david-fincher-the-procedural-as-obsession/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David Fincher shoots dozens of takes of the same shot — the legends say fifty, seventy, a hundred — until the actors stop performing and simply &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt;. That obsessive process is not a quirk sitting beside his films; it is the subject of them. Almost every Fincher picture is about a person who cannot stop working the problem: a detective who will not let the case go, a programmer who will not stop until the site is perfect, a hitman who has built an entire philosophy of discipline around the act of waiting. The man who does a hundred takes makes films about people who do a hundred takes at life, and it usually costs them everything they have.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bong Joon-ho: Genre as Scalpel</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/bong-joon-ho-genre-as-scalpel/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When &lt;em&gt;Parasite&lt;/em&gt; swept the 2020 Oscars — the first film not in English to win Best Picture — a lot of viewers met Bong Joon-ho for the first time and assumed they had discovered a new auteur. They had discovered a twenty-year veteran at the peak of a project he had been running since his debut. Every Bong film is a genre film that turns, halfway through, into an autopsy of a class system. The monster movie is about incompetent government. The murder mystery is about a nation that cannot see its own poor. The heist is about who gets to ride at the front of the train. He picks up the tools of popular cinema — the ones that put bodies in seats — and uses them as a scalpel to open society up and show you the organs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Nightcrawler: Gyllenhaal, the Camera, and the Ghoul of Los Angeles</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/nightcrawler-gyllenhaal-the-camera-and-the-ghoul-of-los-angeles/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some films arrive already knowing what they are. &lt;em&gt;Nightcrawler&lt;/em&gt;, Dan Gilroy&amp;rsquo;s 2014 directorial debut, opens on a man stealing chain-link fencing and manhole covers under a freeway overpass, and by the time he has talked his way out of an encounter with a security guard, you understand the entire moral universe of the picture. Louis Bloom is a thief who reads business-seminar jargon the way other men read scripture. He is looking for a career. Los Angeles, filmed as a smear of sodium light and empty boulevards, is about to hand him one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Drive: Refn's Neon Fairy Tale With a Hammer</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/drive-refns-neon-fairy-tale-with-a-hammer/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drive&lt;/em&gt; opens with a promise and then keeps it in a way almost no crime film dares. A getaway driver explains, in a flat monotone, the exact terms of his service — five minutes, anything happens in that window he is yours, a minute either side and he is gone — and then Nicolas Winding Refn films the getaway itself as a slow, patient, nerve-shredding game of hide-and-seek through night-time Los Angeles, more about stillness and timing than about speed. It tells you everything. This is a film about a man of absolute competence and almost no words, moving through a neon city with the poise of a knight, and it is going to make you wait for the violence and then punish you for wanting it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Oldboy: The Corridor, the Twist, and Park Chan-wook's Rage</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/oldboy-the-corridor-the-twist-and-park-chan-wooks-rage/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oldboy&lt;/em&gt; has been reduced, over twenty years, to three things: a man eating a live octopus, a fight down a corridor filmed in one long sideways take, and a twist so vicious that people who have never seen the film know to be careful discussing it. That reduction does the film a disservice, because underneath the shocks Park Chan-wook made a genuine tragedy — a revenge story so total that it swallows the avenger, the target, and the audience&amp;rsquo;s own appetite for revenge along with them. Revisited now, with the initial jolt long spent, it plays less like a provocation and more like a Greek drama with the lights turned all the way up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ten One-Location Thrillers</title><link>https://vo.rs/screen/ten-one-location-thrillers/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no cheaper superpower in cinema than a locked room. Trap your characters in a single space and every ordinary object becomes a weapon or an exit, every glance between them a negotiation, every minute of screen time a tightening of the same screw. The confinement does the director&amp;rsquo;s work: with nowhere to cut away to, the tension has to keep building inside the frame, and the audience starts reading the walls. Some of these films were made for almost nothing and used the limitation as a dare. Others chose the box on purpose, because a great thriller is often just a pressure vessel with people inside it. The device is ancient — the stage play has always known it — and cinema keeps rediscovering that the surest route to suspense is to shut the door and throw away the key.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>